ArticleBMC medical research methodology2016
How large are the consequences of covariate imbalance in cluster randomized trials: a simulation study with a continuous outcome and a binary covariate at the cluster level.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multilevel Intervention and Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Disparities: A Secondary Analysis of a Cluster Randomized Trial.JAMA network open · 2025Trial
- Health effects and cost-effectiveness of a multilevel physical activity intervention in low-income older adults; results from the PEP4PA cluster randomized controlled trial.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2022Trial
- Change in GPS-assessed walking locations following a cluster-randomized controlled physical activity trial in older adults, results from the MIPARC trial.Health & place · 2021Trial
- Workflows to automate covariate-adaptive randomization in REDCap via data entry triggers.JAMIA open · 2025Article
- A Cluster Randomized Study to Explore Case Definitions, Clinical Course and Consequences of RSV in Community-Dwelling Adults Aged ≥ 50 Years.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Covariate-constrained randomization in cluster randomized 2x2 factorial trials: Application to a diabetes prevention study.Research square · 2024Article
- How should a cluster randomized trial be analyzed?Journal of epidemiology and population health · 2024Article
- Key considerations for designing, conducting and analysing a cluster randomized trial.International journal of epidemiology · 2023Article
- Comparing analytical strategies for balancing site-level characteristics in stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials: a simulation study.BMC medical research methodology · 2023Article
- Performance of methods for analyzing continuous data from stratified cluster randomized trials - A simulation study.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2023Article
- Tuberculosis in Prisons: Importance of Considering the Clustering in the Analysis of Cross-Sectional Studies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Mind the gap: covariate constrained randomisation can protect against substantial power loss in parallel cluster randomised trials.BMC medical research methodology · 2022Article
- Impact of baseline covariate imbalance on bias in treatment effect estimation in cluster randomized trials: Race as an example.Contemporary clinical trials · 2020Article
- What are the statistical implications of treatment non-compliance in cluster randomized trials: A simulation study.Statistics in medicine · 2019Article
- Choosing an imbalance metric for covariate-constrained randomization in multiple-arm cluster-randomized trials.Trials · 2019Article
- Using Cluster Bootstrapping to Analyze Nested Data With a Few Clusters.Educational and psychological measurement · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe number of clusters in a cluster randomized trial is often low. It is therefore likely random assignment of clusters to treatment conditions results in covariate imbalance. There are no studies that quantify the consequences of covariate imbalance in cluster randomized trials on parameter and standard error bias and on power to detect treatment effects.
methodsThe consequences of covariance imbalance in unadjusted and adjusted linear mixed models are investigated by means of a simulation study. The factors in this study are the degree of imbalance, the covariate effect size, the cluster size and the intraclass correlation coefficient. The covariate is binary and measured at the cluster level; the outcome is continuous and measured at the individual level.
resultsThe results show covariate imbalance results in negligible parameter bias and small standard error bias in adjusted linear mixed models. Ignoring the possibility of covariate imbalance while calculating the sample size at the cluster level may result in a loss in power of at most 25 % in the adjusted linear mixed model. The results are more severe for the unadjusted linear mixed model: parameter biases up to 100 % and standard error biases up to 200 % may be observed. Power levels based on the unadjusted linear mixed model are often too low. The consequences are most severe for large clusters and/or small intraclass correlation coefficients since then the required number of clusters to achieve a desired power level is smallest.
conclusionsThe possibility of covariate imbalance should be taken into account while calculating the sample size of a cluster randomized trial. Otherwise more sophisticated methods to randomize clusters to treatments should be used, such as stratification or balance algorithms. All relevant covariates should be carefully identified, be actually measured and included in the statistical model to avoid severe levels of parameter and standard error bias and insufficient power levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.