ArticleBMC public health2016
Exploratory study of the implications of research on the use of smart connected devices for prevention: a scoping review.
Article in BMC public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of the e-Tabac Info Service application for smoking cessation: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.BMJ open · 2020Trial
- Current State of Connected Sensor Technologies Used During Rehabilitation Care: Protocol for a Scoping Review.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- Experiences Among Patients With Cystic Fibrosis in the MucoExocet Study of Using Connected Devices for the Management of Pulmonary Exacerbations: Grounded Theory Qualitative Research.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- The impact of eHealth on relationships and trust in primary care: a review of reviews.BMC primary care · 2023Review
- Acceptability of technology-based physical activity intervention profiles and their motivational factors in obesity care: a latent profile transition analysis.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2021Article
- The French eHealth Acceptability Scale Using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 Model: Instrument Validation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Using theory of change to develop an intervention theory for designing and evaluating behavior change SDApps for healthy eating and physical exercise: the OCAPREV theory.BMC public health · 2019Article
- Identifying Frameworks for Validation and Monitoring of Consensual Behavioral Intervention Technologies: Narrative Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Review
- Electronic Patient-Generated Health Data to Facilitate Disease Prevention and Health Promotion: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Article
- The second information revolution: digitalization brings opportunities and concerns for public health.European journal of public health · 2019Article
- Connected Health Services: Framework for an Impact Assessment.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Article
- Protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial of the use of Physical ACtivity monitors in an Exercise Referral Setting: the PACERS study.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSmart devices and mobile applications are now an integral part of all aspects of everyday life. They are particularly numerous in the field of health, contributing to the movement called ehealth. What is the potential role of these devices as prevention supports? The purpose of this article is to provide an exploratory analysis of the use, efficacy and contribution to conventional prevention strategies.
methodsTo address this issue, we conducted a scoping-review on the basis of 105 publications from the fields of medicine and human sciences.
resultsThree dimensions of the use of smart devices in the field of health were identified: 1/a quantification tool allowing the users to measure their activities; 2/a tool of self-positioning in the community; 3/an interface between the medical world and the population, modifying the hierarchy of knowledge. However, few published studies have investigated the determinants of the efficacy of these devices and their impact on individual behaviours and professional health practices.
conclusionBased on the hypothesis of possible integration of these devices in prevention policies, it would be interesting to investigate two research issues: how and under what psycho-socio-environmental conditions can smart devices contribute to the adoption of positive health behaviours? To what degree does the use of smart devices modify the health care professional-patient relationship? Finding answers to these questions could help to define the real place of these devices in prevention strategies by determining their complementarity with respect to other prevention strategies, and the conditions of their efficacy on behaviours and inequalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.