Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27401754›Full record

ArticleGenetics2016

Genomics of Natural Populations: How Differentially Expressed Genes Shape the Evolution of Chromosomal Inversions in Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Zachary L Fuller, Gwilym D Haynes, Stephen Richards, Stephen W Schaeffer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Population genomics ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Standing genetic variation and chromosome differences drove rapid ecotype formation in a major malaria mosquito.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. The relevance of chromatin architecture to genome rearrangements inPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zachary L FullerDepartment of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802-5301.ORCID 0000-0003-4765-9227
Gwilym D HaynesDepartment of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802-5301 zlf105@psu.edu.
Stephen RichardsHuman Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030.
Stephen W SchaefferDepartment of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802-5301.
Pennsylvania State University · USBaylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

Computation, Bioinformatics, and Statistics (CBIOS) Training ProgramT32GM102057 · NIGMS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI CHIAROMONTE, FRANCESCA, GIRIRAJAN, SANTHOSH · 2013 to 2022
$2.7M
Genomic Mechanisms of Chromosomal Rearrangements in Drosophila PseudoobscuraR01GM098478 · NIGMS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI SCHAEFFER, STEPHEN W · 2011 to 2014
$763k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM098478NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM102057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromosomal rearrangements can shape the structure of genetic variation in the genome directly through alteration of genes at breakpoints or indirectly by holding combinations of genetic variants together due to reduced recombination. The third chromosome of Drosophila pseudoobscura is a model system to test hypotheses about how rearrangements are established in populations because its third chromosome is polymorphic for >30 gene arrangements that were generated by a series of overlapping inversion mutations. Circumstantial evidence has suggested that these gene arrangements are selected. Despite the expected homogenizing effects of extensive gene flow, the frequencies of arrangements form gradients or clines in nature, which have been stable since the system was first described >80 years ago. Furthermore, multiple arrangements exist at appreciable frequencies across several ecological niches providing the opportunity for heterokaryotypes to form. In this study, we tested whether genes are differentially expressed among chromosome arrangements in first instar larvae, adult females and males. In addition, we asked whether transcriptional patterns in heterokaryotypes are dominant, semidominant, overdominant, or underdominant. We find evidence for a significant abundance of differentially expressed genes across the inverted regions of the third chromosome, including an enrichment of genes involved in sensory perception for males. We find the majority of loci show additivity in heterokaryotypes. Our results suggest that multiple genes have expression differences among arrangements that were either captured by the original inversion mutation or accumulated after it reached polymorphic frequencies, providing a potential source of genetic variation for selection to act upon. These data suggest that the inversions are favored because of their indirect effect of recombination suppression that has held different combinations of differentially expressed genes together in the various gene arrangement backgrounds.

Indexed as

Chromosome InversionGene Expression RegulationAnimalsBiological EvolutionChromosomes, InsectDrosophilaFemaleGene FlowGene OrderGenomicsMaleMetagenomicsTranscriptomeadaptationexpression inheritancegene expressioninversions

Identifiers

PMID27401754
PMCPMC5012393
OpenAlexW2462449225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.