Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27401537›Full record

Trial reportAIDS and behavior2017

Exploring Patterns of Awareness and Use of HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Among Young Men Who Have Sex with Men.

Benjamin B Strauss, George J Greene, Gregory Phillips, Ramona Bhatia, Krystal Madkins, Jeffrey T Parsons, Brian Mustanski

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in AIDS and behavior, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Benjamin B StraussNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
George J GreeneInstitute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing and Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, 625 N. Michigan Ave., #2700, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Gregory PhillipsInstitute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing and Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, 625 N. Michigan Ave., #2700, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Ramona BhatiaDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Krystal MadkinsInstitute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing and Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, 625 N. Michigan Ave., #2700, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Jeffrey T ParsonsCenter for HIV Educational Studies and Training (CHEST), Hunter College and the Graduate Center of the City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Brian MustanskiInstitute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing and Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, 625 N. Michigan Ave., #2700, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA. brian@northwestern.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9222-5116

Funding

Disparities in COVID Disease Severity and Outcomes in New York CityUL1TR002384 · NCATS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI JULIANNE L IMPERATO-MCGINLEY · 2017 to 2026
$86.2M
Efficacy of Internet-based HIV preventionR01DA035145 · NIDA · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI MUSTANSKI, BRIAN · 2012 to 2016
$3.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002384NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA035145
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has shown promise as a safe and effective HIV prevention strategy, but there is limited research on awareness and use among young men who have sex with men (YMSM). Using baseline data from the "Keep It Up! 2.0" randomized control trial, we examined differences in PrEP awareness and use among racially diverse YMSM (N = 759; mean age = 24.2 years). Participants were recruited from study sites in Atlanta, Chicago, and New York City, as well as through national advertising on social media applications. While 67.5 % of participants reported awareness of PrEP, 8.7 % indicated using the medication. Awareness, but not use, varied by demographic variables. PrEP-users had twice as many condomless anal sex partners (ERR = 2.05) and more condomless anal sex acts (ERR = 1.60) than non-users. Future research should aim to improve PrEP awareness and uptake among YMSM and address condom use.

Indexed as

AwarenessHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePre-Exposure ProphylaxisAdolescentAdultHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MaleHumansMalePatient Acceptance of Health CarePrimary Health CareSexual BehaviorUnited StatesUnsafe SexYoung AdultBehaviorHomosexuality, malePre-exposure prophylaxisPrimary health careRisk reductionSexual behavior

Identifiers

PMID27401537
PMCPMC5226918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.