Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27401427›Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine2016

Concept Mapping as a Method to Engage Patients in Clinical Quality Improvement.

Marianna LaNoue, Geoffrey Mills, Amy Cunningham, Adam Sharbaugh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Patient influence on general practice service improvement decision making: a participatory research mixed-methods intervention study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marianna LaNoueDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College and Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Marianna.Lanoue@jefferson.edu.
Geoffrey MillsDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College and Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Amy CunninghamDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College and Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Adam SharbaughSidney Kimmel Medical College and Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient engagement has become a primary care research and practice priority. Little guidance exists, however, on how best to engage patients in primary care practice improvement, or how to measure the impact of their engagement. We present an overview of group concept mapping as a method for engaging patients in primary care practice improvement. We detail the group concept mapping process as a tool for use in primary care practice improvement, research, and evaluation, and we present resources to enable researchers and practice leaders to use this tool in practice improvement. To illustrate the method, we present a practice-based quality improvement project conducted with patients and staff at a large urban academic primary care practice.

Indexed as

Quality ImprovementQuality of Health CareFocus GroupsHumansPatient-Centered CarePatient ParticipationPrimary Health Careconcept mappingpatient-centered medical homepatient engagementpractice-based researchprimary carequality improvement

Identifiers

PMID27401427
PMCPMC4940469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.