Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27401103›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2016

Medical ward round competence in internal medicine - an interview study towards an interprofessional development of an Entrustable Professional Activity (EPA).

Teresa Wölfel, Esther Beltermann, Christian Lottspeich, Elisa Vietz, Martin R Fischer, Ralf Schmidmaier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Teresa WölfelInstitut für Didaktik und Ausbildungsforschung in der Medizin, Klinikum der LMU München, Ziemssenstrasse 1, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Esther BeltermannInstitut für Didaktik und Ausbildungsforschung in der Medizin, Klinikum der LMU München, Ziemssenstrasse 1, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Christian LottspeichMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Klinikum der Universität München (LMU), Ziemssenstrasse 1, 80336, Munchen, Germany.
Elisa VietzInstitut für Didaktik und Ausbildungsforschung in der Medizin, Klinikum der LMU München, Ziemssenstrasse 1, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Martin R FischerInstitut für Didaktik und Ausbildungsforschung in der Medizin, Klinikum der LMU München, Ziemssenstrasse 1, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Ralf SchmidmaierInstitut für Didaktik und Ausbildungsforschung in der Medizin, Klinikum der LMU München, Ziemssenstrasse 1, 80336, Munich, Germany. ralf.schmidmaier@med.uni-muenchen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe medical ward round is a central but complex activity that is of relevance from the first day of work. However, difficulties for young doctors have been reported. Instruction of ward round competence in medical curricula is hampered by the lack of a standardized description of the procedure. This paper aims to identify and describe physicians' tasks and relevant competences for conducting a medical ward round on the first day of professional work.

methodsA review of recent literature revealed known important aspects of medical ward rounds. These were used for the development of a semi-structured interview schedule. Medical ward round experts working at different hospitals were interviewed. The sample consisted of 14 ward physicians (M = 8.82 years of work experience) and 12 nurses (M = 14.55 years of work experience) working in different specializations of internal medicine. All interviews were audiotaped, fully transcribed, and analyzed using an inductive-deductive coding scheme.

resultsNine fields of competences with 18 related sub-competences and 62 observable tasks were identified as relevant for conducting a medical ward round. Over 70 % of the experts named communication, collaborative clinical reasoning and organization as essential competences. Deeper analysis further unveiled the importance of self-management, management of difficult situations, error management and teamwork.

conclusionThe study is the first to picture ward round competences and related tasks in detail and to define an EPA "Conducting an internal medicine ward round" based on systematic interprofessional expert interviews. It thus provides a basis for integration of ward round competences in the medical curricula in an evidence based manner and gives a framework for the development of instructional intervention studies and comparative studies in other medical fields.

Indexed as

Interviews as TopicAttitude of Health PersonnelClinical CompetenceContinuity of Patient CareFormative FeedbackHumansInternal MedicineInterprofessional RelationsMedical Staff, HospitalPhysician-Nurse RelationsPhysician-Patient RelationsPhysician's RoleTeaching RoundsCompetencyCurriculum developmentEntrustable professional activityInternal medicine ward roundTeaching methods

Identifiers

PMID27401103
PMCPMC4940908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.