ArticleBMC medicine2016
An external validation of models to predict the onset of chronic kidney disease using population-based electronic health records from Salford, UK.
Article in BMC medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- External validation of prognostic models for chronic kidney disease among type 2 diabetes.Journal of nephrology · 2022Pooled it
- Performance of prediction models for nephropathy in people with type 2 diabetes: systematic review and external validation study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2021Pooled it
- Leveraging ICT Tools to Improve Kidney Health: A Comprehensive Review of Innovations in Nephrology.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- ECG-based deep learning for chronic kidney disease detection and cardiovascular risk prediction.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Adaptable graph neural networks design to support generalizability for clinical event prediction.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2025Article
- Approaches to predict future type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease: A scoping review.PloS one · 2025Article
- The use of imputation in clinical decision support systems: a cardiovascular risk management pilot vignette study among clinicians.European heart journal. Digital health · 2024Article
- Develop and Validate a Risk Score in Predicting Renal Failure in Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis.Kidney diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- A Nomogram for Predicting the Risk of CKD Based on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors.International journal of general medicine · 2023Article
- External validation of six clinical models for prediction of chronic kidney disease in a German population.BMC nephrology · 2022Article
- Nomogram to predict rapid kidney function decline in population at risk of cardiovascular disease.BMC nephrology · 2022Article
- Prediction models used in the progression of chronic kidney disease: A scoping review.PloS one · 2022Article
- Article
- Electronic Medical Record-Based Case Phenotyping for the Charlson Conditions: Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2021Article
- A narrative review of current evidence supporting the implementation of electronic patient-reported outcome measures in the management of chronic diseases.Therapeutic advances in chronic disease · 2021Article
- Acute kidney injury in the UK: a replication cohort study of the variation across three regional populations.BMJ open · 2018Article
- Large-scale external validation and comparison of prognostic models: an application to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.BMC medicine · 2018Article
- External Validation of a Tool Predicting 7-Year Risk of Developing Cardiovascular Disease, Type 2 Diabetes or Chronic Kidney Disease.Journal of general internal medicine · 2018Article
- Hemodynamic Instability during Dialysis: The Potential Role of Intradialytic Exercise.BioMed research international · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major and increasing constituent of disease burdens worldwide. Early identification of patients at increased risk of developing CKD can guide interventions to slow disease progression, initiate timely referral to appropriate kidney care services, and support targeting of care resources. Risk prediction models can extend laboratory-based CKD screening to earlier stages of disease; however, to date, only a few of them have been externally validated or directly compared outside development populations. Our objective was to validate published CKD prediction models applicable in primary care.
methodsWe synthesised two recent systematic reviews of CKD risk prediction models and externally validated selected models for a 5-year horizon of disease onset. We used linked, anonymised, structured (coded) primary and secondary care data from patients resident in Salford (population ~234 k), UK. All adult patients with at least one record in 2009 were followed-up until the end of 2014, death, or CKD onset (n = 178,399). CKD onset was defined as repeated impaired eGFR measures over a period of at least 3 months, or physician diagnosis of CKD Stage 3-5. For each model, we assessed discrimination, calibration, and decision curve analysis.
resultsSeven relevant CKD risk prediction models were identified. Five models also had an associated simplified scoring system. All models discriminated well between patients developing CKD or not, with c-statistics around 0.90. Most of the models were poorly calibrated to our population, substantially over-predicting risk. The two models that did not require recalibration were also the ones that had the best performance in the decision curve analysis.
conclusionsIncluded CKD prediction models showed good discriminative ability but over-predicted the actual 5-year CKD risk in English primary care patients. QKidney, the only UK-developed model, outperformed the others. Clinical prediction models should be (re)calibrated for their intended uses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.