Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27401003›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2016

Articulated spacer provides long-term knee improvement after two-stage reimplantation.

Michele Vasso, Chiara Del Regno, Katia Corona, Rocco D'Apolito, Alfredo Schiavone Panni

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michele VassoDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Molise, Via Francesco De Sanctis, 86100, Campobasso, Italy. vassomichele@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2559-3714
Chiara Del RegnoDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Molise, Via Francesco De Sanctis, 86100, Campobasso, Italy.
Katia CoronaDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Molise, Via Francesco De Sanctis, 86100, Campobasso, Italy.
Rocco D'ApolitoDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Molise, Via Francesco De Sanctis, 86100, Campobasso, Italy.
Alfredo Schiavone PanniDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Molise, Via Francesco De Sanctis, 86100, Campobasso, Italy.
University of Molise · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to determine the long-term outcome in patients who underwent two-stage reimplantation with an articulated spacer following a chronic periprosthetic knee infection. The hypothesis was that the use of an articulated spacer provides significant improvement of clinical results and knee functionality through a long follow-up period, and therefore a durable revision TKA.

methodsForty-six consecutive patients (46 knees) who underwent two-stage reimplantation with an articulated spacer for a chronic periprosthetic knee infection were retrospectively analysed. An articulated cement spacer, moulded in surgery room, was implanted in all cases. Patients were followed for a median period of 12 (range 6-16) years, and no patients were lost to follow-up. Patients were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively through the IKS knee and function scores and ROM.

resultsTwo-stage reimplantation was successful in controlling the infection in 91.3 % of patients. In the 42 patients with a successful two-stage revision, the median IKS knee and function scores were 36 (range 16-56) points and 25 (range 15-35) points, respectively, before the operation, and 76 (range 52-94) points and 70 (range 55-90) points (p < 0.001) at the last follow-up. The median ROM increased from 80 (range 60-110) degrees preoperatively to 115 (range 100-128) degrees (p < 0.01) at the last follow-up.

conclusionsTwo-stage septic revision with an articulated cement spacer provided a significant long-term improvement of preoperative clinical and functional knee scores and therefore a durable revision TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective case series, Level IV.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeBone CementsFemaleHumansKnee JointKnee ProsthesisMaleMiddle AgedProsthesis-Related InfectionsRange of Motion, ArticularReoperationRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBone CementsArticulated spacerFailureInfectionTotal knee arthroplastyTwo-stage reimplantation

Identifiers

PMID27401003
OpenAlexW2465367968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.