Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27400922›Full record

Trial reportJournal of general internal medicine2017

Case Management may Reduce Emergency Department Frequent use in a Universal Health Coverage System: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Patrick Bodenmann, Venetia-Sofia Velonaki, Judith L Griffin, Stéphanie Baggio, Katia Iglesias, Karine Moschetti, Ornella Ruggeri, Bernard Burnand, Jean-Blaise Wasserfallen, Francis Vu and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of general internal medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03641274 (Implementing a Case Management Intervention for Frequent Users of the Emergency Department), which is not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03641274 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Implementing a Case Management Intervention for Frequent Users of the Emergency Department: An Effectiveness-Implementation Hybrid Trial Study Protocol

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of Lausanne HospitalsRan2018 to 2020Enrolled120ConditionsFrequent Users of Emergency Department (FUEDs)ArmsCase-management intervention for frequent users of the emergency department
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Using case management in a universal health coverage system to improve quality of life of frequent Emergency Department users: a randomized controlled trial.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2018
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Patrick BodenmannVulnerable Populations Center, Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. Patrick.Bodenmann@hospvd.ch.
Venetia-Sofia VelonakiInstitute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare, Department of Community Medicine and Public Health, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Judith L GriffinVulnerable Populations Center, Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Stéphanie BaggioLife Course and Social Inequality Research Center, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Katia IglesiasCenter for the Understanding of Social Processes, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Karine MoschettiInstitute of social and preventive medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Ornella RuggeriDepartment of Community Medicine and Public Health, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Bernard BurnandInstitute of social and preventive medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jean-Blaise WasserfallenTechnology Assessment Unit, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Francis VuVulnerable Populations Center, Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Joelle SchupbachVulnerable Populations Center, Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Olivier HugliEmergency Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jean-Bernard DaeppenAlcohol Treatment Center, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
University of Lausanne · CHInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFrequent emergency department (ED) users account for a disproportionately high number of ED visits. Studies on case management (CM) interventions to reduce frequent ED use have shown mixed results, and few studies have been conducted within a universal health coverage system.

objectiveTo determine whether a CM intervention-compared to standard emergency care-reduces ED attendance.

designRandomized controlled trial.

participantsTwo hundred fifty frequent ED users (5 or more visits in the prior 12 months) who visited a public urban ED at the Lausanne University Hospital between May 2012 and July 2013 were allocated to either an intervention (n = 125) or control (n = 125) group, and monitored for 12 months.

interventionsAn individualized CM intervention consisting of concrete assistance in obtaining income entitlements, referral to primary or specialty medical care, access to mental health care or substance abuse treatment, and counseling on at-risk behaviors and health care utilization (in addition to standard care) at baseline and 1, 3, and 5 months. MAIN MEASURES: We used a generalized linear model for count data (negative binomial distribution) to compare the number of ED visits during the 12-month follow-up between CM and usual care, from an intention-to-treat perspective. KEY

resultsAt 12 months, there were 2.71 (±0.23) ED visits in the intervention group versus 3.35 (±0.32) visits among controls (ratio = 0.81, 95 % CI = 0.63; 1.02). In the multivariate model, the effect of the CM intervention on the number of ED visits approached statistical significance (b = -0.219, p = 0.075). The presence of poor social determinants of health was a significant predictor of ED use in the multivariate model (b = 0.280, p = 0.048).

conclusionsCM may reduce ED use by frequent users through an improved orientation to the health care system. Poor social determinants of health significantly increase use of the ED by frequent users.

Indexed as

Patient Acceptance of Health CareAdultAgedCase ManagementEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHospitals, UniversityHumansMaleMiddle AgedNational Health ProgramsSingle-Blind MethodSwitzerlandcase managementclinical trialsutilizationvulnerable populations

Identifiers

PMID27400922
PMCPMC5400747
OpenAlexW2464287537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.