ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2016
Patient Perceptions of Electronic Medical Record Use by Faculty and Resident Physicians: A Mixed Methods Study.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Patient engagement in multimorbidity: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Pooled it
- Perceptions of healthcare professionals about the adoption and use of EHR in Gulf Cooperation Council countries: a systematic review.BMJ health & care informatics · 2020Pooled it
- Clinical evaluation of MiADE: a natural language processing system for assisting structured diagnosis recording at the point of care.BMJ health & care informatics · 2026Article
- Examining Racial Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening and the Role of Online Medical Record Use: Findings From a Cross-Sectional Study of a National Survey.JMIR cancer · 2024Article
- Understanding patients' experiences during transitions from one electronic health record to another: A scoping review.PEC innovation · 2024Article
- Perceived Patient Workload and Its Impact on Outcomes During New Cancer Patient Visits: Analysis of a Convenience Sample.JMIR human factors · 2023Article
- Orthopedic Resident and Patient Perception of Electronic Medical Record Use During the Clinic Visit.Cureus · 2023Article
- Teaching Telemedicine: The Next Frontier for Medical Educators.JMIR medical education · 2021Article
- Impact of an Educational Comic to Enhance Patient-Physician-Electronic Health Record Engagement: Prospective Observational Study.JMIR human factors · 2021Article
- Day-1 Competencies for Veterinarians Specific to Health Informatics.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021Article
- The elephant in the room: a postphenomenological view on the electronic health record and its impact on the clinical encounter.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2020Article
- Patient satisfaction with the implementation of electronic medical Records in the Western Region, Saudi Arabia, 2018.BMC family practice · 2020Article
- The Impact of Electronic Health Records on the Duration of Patients' Visits: Time and Motion Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2020Article
- Article
- A Pilot Study on the Effects of Physician Gaze on Patient Satisfaction in the Setting of Electronic Health Records.Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017) · 2019Article
- A Comparison of Electronic Patient-Portal Use Among Patients with Resident and Attending Primary Care Providers.Journal of general internal medicine · 2018Article
- Towards a Clinical Trial Protocol to Evaluate Health Information Systems: Evaluation of a Computerized System for Monitoring Tuberculosis from a Patient Perspective in Brazil.Journal of medical systems · 2018Article
- Integrating Patient-Centered Electronic Health Record Communication Training into Resident Onboarding: Curriculum Development and Post-Implementation Survey Among Housestaff.JMIR medical education · 2018Article
- Perspectives in Primary Care: Knowing the Patient as a Person in the Precision Medicine Era.Annals of family medicine · 2018Article
- Time Spent on Dedicated Patient Care and Documentation Tasks Before and After the Introduction of a Structured and Standardized Electronic Health Record.Applied clinical informatics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile concerns remain regarding Electronic Medical Records (EMR) use impeding doctor-patient communication, resident and faculty patient perspectives post-widespread EMR adoption remain largely unexplored.
objectiveWe aimed to describe patient perspectives of outpatient resident and faculty EMR use and identify positive and negative EMR use examples to promote optimal utilization.
designThis was a prospective mixed-methods study.
participantsInternal medicine faculty and resident patients at the University of Chicago's primary care clinic participated in the study. APPROACH: In 2013, one year after EMR implementation, telephone interviews were conducted with patients using open-ended and Likert style questions to elicit positive and negative perceptions of EMR use by physicians. Interview transcripts were analyzed qualitatively to develop a coding classification. Satisfaction with physician EMR use was examined using bivariate statistics.
resultsIn total, 108 interviews were completed and analyzed. Two major themes were noted: (1) Clinical Functions of EMR and (2) Communication Functions of EMR; as well as six subthemes: (1a) Clinical Care (i.e., clinical efficiency), (1b) Documentation (i.e., proper record keeping and access), (1c) Information Access, (1d) Educational Resource, (2a) Patient Engagement and (2b) Physical Focus (i.e., body positioning). Overall, 85 % (979/1154) of patient perceptions of EMR use were positive, with the majority within the "Clinical Care" subtheme (n = 218). Of negative perceptions, 66 % (115/175) related to the "Communication Functions" theme, and the majority of those related to the "Physical Focus" subtheme (n = 71). The majority of patients (90 %, 95/106) were satisfied with physician EMR use: 59 % (63/107) reported the computer had a positive effect on their relationship and only 7 % (8/108) reported the EMR made it harder to talk with their doctors.
conclusionsDespite concerns regarding EMRs impeding doctor-patient communication, patients reported largely positive perceptions of the EMR with many patients reporting high levels of satisfaction. Future work should focus on improving doctors "physical focus" when using the EMR to redirect towards the patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.