Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27400789›Full record

ArticleStem cells translational medicine2016

Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Differentiate Into Functional Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Repair Bone Defects.

Dmitriy Sheyn, Shiran Ben-David, Galina Shapiro, Sandra De Mel, Maxim Bez, Loren Ornelas, Anais Sahabian, Dhruv Sareen, Xiaoyu Da, Gadi Pelled and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cells translational medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 147 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Stem Cells and Bone Tissue Engineering.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. iPSC-derived tenocytes seeded on microgrooved 3D printed scaffolds for Achilles tendon regeneration.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2023
    Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dmitriy SheynDepartment of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Shiran Ben-DavidDepartment of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Galina ShapiroSkeletal Biotech Laboratory, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Sandra De MelDepartment of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Maxim BezDepartment of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Loren OrnelasBoard of Governors Regenerative Medicine Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Anais SahabianBoard of Governors Regenerative Medicine Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Dhruv SareenSkeletal Biotech Laboratory, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Xiaoyu DaBiomedical Imaging Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Gadi PelledDepartment of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Wafa TawackoliDepartment of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Zhenqiu LiuBiostatistics and Bioinformatics Core, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Dan GazitDepartment of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Zulma GazitDepartment of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA zulma.gazit@csmc.edu.
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · USHebrew University of Jerusalem · IL

Funding

Transgenic & Knock-out MouseP30DK063491 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Andrea L Hevener · 2003 to 2026
$40.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK063491
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

: Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are currently the most established cells for skeletal tissue engineering and regeneration; however, their availability and capability of self-renewal are limited. Recent discoveries of somatic cell reprogramming may be used to overcome these challenges. We hypothesized that induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) that were differentiated into MSCs could be used for bone regeneration. Short-term exposure of embryoid bodies to transforming growth factor-β was used to direct iPSCs toward MSC differentiation. During this process, two types of iPSC-derived MSCs (iMSCs) were identified: early (aiMSCs) and late (tiMSCs) outgrowing cells. The transition of iPSCs toward MSCs was documented using MSC marker flow cytometry. Both types of iMSCs differentiated in vitro in response to osteogenic or adipogenic supplements. The results of quantitative assays showed that both cell types retained their multidifferentiation potential, although aiMSCs demonstrated higher osteogenic potential than tiMSCs and bone marrow-derived MSCs (BM-MSCs). Ectopic injections of BMP6-overexpressing tiMSCs produced no or limited bone formation, whereas similar injections of BMP6-overexpressing aiMSCs resulted in substantial bone formation. Upon orthotopic injection into radial defects, all three cell types regenerated bone and contributed to defect repair. In conclusion, MSCs can be derived from iPSCs and exhibit self-renewal without tumorigenic ability. Compared with BM-MSCs, aiMSCs acquire more of a stem cell phenotype, whereas tiMSCs acquire more of a differentiated osteoblast phenotype, which aids bone regeneration but does not allow the cells to induce ectopic bone formation (even when triggered by bone morphogenetic proteins), unless in an orthotopic site of bone fracture. SIGNIFICANCE: Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are currently the most established cells for skeletal tissue engineering and regeneration of various skeletal conditions; however, availability of autologous MSCs is very limited. This study demonstrates a new method to differentiate human fibroblast-derived induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) to cells with MSC properties, which we comprehensively characterized including differentiation potential and transcriptomic analysis. We showed that these iPS-derived MSCs are able to regenerate nonunion bone defects in mice more efficiently than bone marrow-derived human MSCs when overexpressing BMP6 using a nonviral transfection method.

Indexed as

Bone regenerationHuman induced pluripotent stem cellsMesenchymal stem cellsTransforming growth factor-β

Identifiers

PMID27400789
PMCPMC5070500
OpenAlexW2535903842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.