Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27400325›Full record

ArticleVector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.)2016

Rodents as a Source of Salmonella Contamination in Wet Markets in Thailand.

Alexis Ribas, Weerachai Saijuntha, Takeshi Agatsuma, Veronika Prantlová, Srisupaph Poonlaphdecha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Ecology and epidemiology of multidrug-resistantOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Emergence and Comparative Genome Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  10. Low Occurrence ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Zoonotic potential and prevalence ofInfection ecology & epidemiology · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexis Ribas1 Biodiversity Research Group, Faculty of Science, Udon Thani Rajabhat University , Udon Thani, Thailand .
Weerachai Saijuntha2 Walai Rukhavej Botanical Research Institute (WRBRI), Mahasarakham University , Maha Sarakham, Thailand .
Takeshi Agatsuma3 Division of Environmental Health Sciences, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University , Nankoku, Japan .
Veronika Prantlová4 Faculty of Agriculture, University of South Bohemia , České Budejovice, Czech Republic .
Srisupaph Poonlaphdecha1 Biodiversity Research Group, Faculty of Science, Udon Thani Rajabhat University , Udon Thani, Thailand .

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFew studies have been conducted on the presence of Salmonella in the rodents that inhabit the wet markets that play an important role in daily life in Southeast Asia. The results of studies of rodents as carriers of Salmonella vary greatly, ranging from an absence of Salmonella to high prevalences. Previous studies investigated habitats such as farms and urban and wild areas where there is less rodent-human interaction than in wet markets. Consequently, the potential role of rodents as reservoirs and transmitters of Salmonella in wet markets is of great interest.

methodsRodents were trapped in eight traditional wet markets in Thailand and identified to species level. Subsequently, they were screened for Salmonella and isolates were serotyped.

resultsA total of 110 rats (Rattus norvegicus and Rattus exulans) were examined. Overall, the prevalence of Salmonella in rats was 49.10%, but varied between 0% and 73.3% among markets. Three serovars were identified: Salmonella Typhimurium (30%), S. Weltevreden (12.7%), and S. 4,[5],12:i:- (6.4%).

conclusionsOur results show that rodents in wet markets are a potential reservoir of Salmonella due to the close contact they have with humans and food. The three isolated serovars, of which serovar S. 4,[5],12:i:- is reported for the first time in rodents, are among the 10 commonest serovars isolated from humans in Thailand. Thus, more attention should be paid to rodents as potential reservoirs of Salmonella.

Indexed as

CommerceAnimalsDisease ReservoirsFood MicrobiologyRatsSalmonellaSalmonella Infections, AnimalThailandZoonosesNorway ratPacific ratS. 4,[5],12:i:SalmonellaTyphimuriumWeltevredenWet marketZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID27400325
PMCPMC4960473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.