Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27399843›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2016

Neural activity promotes long-distance, target-specific regeneration of adult retinal axons.

Jung-Hwan A Lim, Benjamin K Stafford, Phong L Nguyen, Brian V Lien, Chen Wang, Katherine Zukor, Zhigang He, Andrew D Huberman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 185 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
185citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

185 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Rhesus macaques with anProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Cutting-edge technologies in neural regeneration.Cell regeneration (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  18. The neuroimmune interface in retinal regeneration.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

125 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jung-Hwan A LimDivision of Biological Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Benjamin K StaffordDepartment of Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Phong L NguyenDepartment of Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Brian V LienDivision of Biological Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Chen WangBoston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Katherine ZukorAnimal, Dairy and Veterinary Sciences Department, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA.
Zhigang HeBoston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Andrew D HubermanDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.

Funding

Mouse Neurodevelopmental Behavior CoreU54HD090255 · NICHD · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI STEVENS, BETH ANN · 2016 to 2020
$5.2M
Promoting optic nerve and retinofugal pathway regenerationR01EY026100 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI HUBERMAN, ANDREW D · 2016 to 2019
$1.6M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY026100NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD090255
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Axons in the mammalian CNS fail to regenerate after injury. Here we show that if the activity of mouse retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) is increased by visual stimulation or using chemogenetics, their axons regenerate. We also show that if enhancement of neural activity is combined with elevation of the cell-growth-promoting pathway involving mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), RGC axons regenerate long distances and re-innervate the brain. Analysis of genetically labeled RGCs revealed that this regrowth can be target specific: RGC axons navigated back to their correct visual targets and avoided targets incorrect for their function. Moreover, these regenerated connections were successful in partially rescuing a subset of visual behaviors. Our findings indicate that combining neural activity with activation of mTOR can serve as powerful tool for enhancing axon regeneration, and they highlight the remarkable capacity of CNS neurons to re-establish accurate circuit connections in adulthood.

Indexed as

AgingAnimalsAxonsMice, TransgenicNerve RegenerationOptic NerveRetinaRetinal Ganglion CellsTOR Serine-Threonine KinasesmTOR protein, mouseTOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID27399843
PMCPMC5708130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.