ArticleBiopreservation and biobanking2016
An International Survey of Brain Banking Operation and Characterization Practices.
Article in Biopreservation and biobanking, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The contribution of brain banks to knowledge discovery in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A systematic review.Neuropathology and applied neurobiology · 2022Pooled it
- Transcriptome Alterations Caused by Social Defeat Stress of Various Durations in Mice and Its Relevance to Depression and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Humans: A Meta-Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Pooled it
- Digital Atlases to Unlock the Potential of Brain Biorepository Tissues for Interdisciplinary Research.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Review
- Brain banking in the United States and Europe: Importance, challenges, and future trends.Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology · 2024Article
- Molecular Abnormalities in BTBR Mice and Their Relevance to Schizophrenia and Autism Spectrum Disorders: An Overview of Transcriptomic and Proteomic Studies.Biomedicines · 2023Article
- Biovalue in Human Brain Banking: Applications and Challenges for Research in Neurodegenerative Diseases.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Man's best friend in life and death: scientific perspectives and challenges of dog brain banking.GeroScience · 2021Review
- Brain Banks Spur New Frontiers in Neuropsychiatric Research and Strategies for Analysis and Validation.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2019Review
- National Institute on Drug Abuse genomics consortium white paper: Coordinating efforts between human and animal addiction studies.Genes, brain, and behavior · 2019Review
- Postmortem brain tissue as an underutilized resource to study the molecular pathology of neuropsychiatric disorders across different ethnic populations.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2019Review
- Brain Banking for Research into Neurodegenerative Disorders and Ageing.Neuroscience bulletin · 2019Review
- Brain banking in low and middle-income countries: Raison D'être for the Ibadan Brain Ageing, Dementia And Neurodegeneration (IBADAN) Brain Bank Project.Brain research bulletin · 2019Review
- Banking brains: a pre-mortem "how to" guide to successful donation.Cell and tissue banking · 2018Review
- Brains for Dementia Research: Evolution in a Longitudinal Brain Donation Cohort to Maximize Current and Future Value.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2018Article
- VA's National PTSD Brain Bank: a National Resource for Research.Current psychiatry reports · 2017Review
- An Australian brain bank and the future of alcohol and major neuropsychiatric disorders research.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Brain banks continue to make a major contribution to the study of neurological and psychiatric disorders. The current complexity and scope of research heighten the need for well-characterized cases and the demand for larger cohorts and necessitate strategies, such as the establishment of bank networks based in regional areas. While individual brain banks have developed protocols that meet researchers' needs within the confines of resources and funding, to further promote collaboration, standardization and scientific validity and understanding of the current protocols of participating banks are required. A survey was sent to brain banks, identified by an Internet search, to investigate operational protocols, case characterization, cohort management, data collection, standardization, and degree of collaboration between banks. The majority of the 24 banks that returned the survey have been established for more than 20 years, and most are affiliated with a regional network. While prospective donor programs were the primary source of donation, the data collected on donors varied. Longitudinal information assists case characterization and enhances the analysis capabilities of research. However, acquiring this information depended on the availability of qualified staff. Respondents indicated a high level of importance for standardization, but only 8 of 24 considered this occurred between banks. Standard diagnostic criteria were not achieved in the classification of controls, and some banks relied on the researcher to indicate the criteria for classification of controls. Although the capacity to collaborate with other banks was indicated by 16 of 24 banks, this occurred infrequently. Engagement of all brain banks to participate toward a consensus of diagnostic tools, especially for controls, will strengthen collaboration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.