Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27399745›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2016

Barriers and Enablers to Enacting Child and Youth Related Injury Prevention Legislation in Canada.

Linda Rothman, Ian Pike, Kathy Belton, Lise Olsen, Pam Fuselli, Alison Macpherson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. State-of-the-art review: preventing child and youth pedestrian motor vehicle collisions: critical issues and future directions.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2021
    Review
  3. Effect of Using Mobile Phones on Driver's Control Behavior Based on Naturalistic Driving Data.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  4. An interprovincial comparison of unintentional childhood injury rates in Canada for the period 2006-2012.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Linda RothmanFaculty of Health-School of Kinesiology & Health Science, Norman Bethune College, York University, 4700 Keele St., Room 337, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada. lrothman@yorku.ca.
Ian PikeDepartment of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada. ipike@cw.bc.ca.
Kathy BeltonInjury Prevention Centre, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, 8308 114 St. NW, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E1, Canada. kathy.belton@ualberta.ca.
Lise OlsenFaculty of Health and Social Development, School of Nursing, The University of British Columbia, Okanagan, 1147 Research Rd., ART 360, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada. lise.olsen@ubc.ca.
Pam FuselliKnowledge Transfer & Stakeholder Relations, Parachute 150 Eglinton Ave East Suite 300, Toronto, ON M4P 1E8, Canada. pfuselli@parachutecanada.org.
Alison MacphersonFaculty of Health-School of Kinesiology & Health Science, Norman Bethune College, York University, 4700 Keele St., Room 337, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada. alison3@yorku.ca.

Funding

CIHR RN162202-278772
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Injury prevention policy is crucial for the safety of Canada's children; however legislation is not adopted uniformly across the country. This study aimed to identify key barriers and enablers to enacting injury prevention legislation. Purposive snowball sampling identified individuals involved in injury prevention throughout Canada. An online survey asked respondents to identify policies that were relevant to them, and whether legislation existed in their province. Respondents rated the importance of barriers or enablers using a 5-point Likert type scale and included open-ended comments. Fifty-seven respondents identified the most common injury topics: bicycle helmets (44, 77%), cell phone-distracted driving (36, 63%), booster seats (28, 49%), ski helmets (24, 42%), and graduated driver's licensing (21, 37%). The top enablers were research/surveillance, managerial/political support and professional group consultation, with much variability between injury topics. Open-ended comments emphasized the importance of a united opinion as an enabler and barriers included costs of protective equipment and inadequate enforcement of legislation. The results highlighted the importance of strategies that include research, management and community collaboration and that injury prevention topics should be addressed individually as information may be lost if topics are considered together. Findings can inform the process of turning injury prevention evidence into action.

Indexed as

Accident PreventionAttitudeBicyclingCanadaChildChild HealthGovernment RegulationHead Protective DevicesHumansSafetySurveys and QuestionnairesWounds and Injuriesbarrierschildrenenablerslegislationyouth

Identifiers

PMID27399745
PMCPMC4962197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.