ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2016
Prediction of Massive Transfusion in Trauma Patients with Shock Index, Modified Shock Index, and Age Shock Index.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04692870 (Association Between Preoperative Shock Index and Hypotension After Spinal Anaesthesia for Non-elective Caesarean Section), which is not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Association Between Preoperative Shock Index and Hypotension After Spinal Anaesthesia for Non-elective Caesarean Section: A Prospective Observational Study
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Shock index as predictor of massive transfusion and mortality in patients with trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Tutorial on Analyzing Paired Longitudinal Data With Serial Correlation and Making Comparisons Between Groups, With Examples for Opioid Consumption and Quality of Life.Anesthesia and analgesia · 2026Article
- Development of a prehospital clinical prediction score for predicting massive blood transfusion in patients with trauma.Resuscitation plus · 2025Article
- Article
- Comprehensive Management of Different Types of Pelvic Fractures Through Multiple Disciplines: A Case Series.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Shock indices as predictors in blunt trauma patients in the emergency department.Biomarkers in medicine · 2025Article
- Is pre-hospital haemoglobin an efficient marker of the need for transfusion and haemorrhagic shock in severe trauma patients? A retrospective observational study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025Observational
- The Age-Modified Shock Index: Predicting Massive Transfusion and Mortality in Traumatic Injury Patients.Emergency medicine international · 2025Article
- Delta shock index predicts injury severity, interventions, and outcomes in trauma patients: A 10-year retrospective observational study.World journal of critical care medicine · 2024Article
- A novel scoring system for early prediction of massive transfusion requirement in trauma patients.Internal and emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Evaluating the Shock Index, Revised Assessment of Bleeding and Transfusion (RABT), Assessment of Blood Consumption (ABC) and novel PTTrauma score to predict critical transfusion threshold (CAT) in penetrating thoracic trauma.Scientific reports · 2024Observational
- Evaluation and treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients taking anticoagulants presenting to the emergency department.International journal of emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Comparison of Modified Shock Index and Shock Index for Predicting Massive Transfusion in Women with Primary Postpartum Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024Article
- Effect of acute alcohol consumption on blunt bowel mesenteric injury: a retrospective analysis.BMC emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Assessment of Machine Learning Methods to Predict Massive Blood Transfusion in Trauma.World journal of surgery · 2023Article
- Superiority of compensatory reserve measurement compared with the Shock index for early and accurate detection of reduced central blood volume status.The journal of trauma and acute care surgery · 2023Article
- Prediction of pre-hospital blood transfusion in trauma patients based on scoring systems.BMC emergency medicine · 2023Article
- Accelerating voxelwise annotation of cross-sectional imaging through AI collaborative labeling with quality assurance and bias mitigation.Frontiers in radiology · 2023Article
- Early Mortality Risk in Acute Trauma Patients: Predictive Value of Injury Severity Score, Trauma Index, and Different Types of Shock Indices.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe shock index (SI) and its derivations, the modified shock index (MSI) and the age shock index (Age SI), have been used to identify trauma patients with unstable hemodynamic status. The aim of this study was to evaluate their use in predicting the requirement for massive transfusion (MT) in trauma patients upon arrival at the hospital.
participantsA patient receiving transfusion of 10 or more units of packed red blood cells or whole blood within 24 h of arrival at the emergency department was defined as having received MT. Detailed data of 2490 patients hospitalized for trauma between 1 January 2009, and 31 December 2014, who had received blood transfusion within 24 h of arrival at the emergency department, were retrieved from the Trauma Registry System of a level I regional trauma center. These included 99 patients who received MT and 2391 patients who did not. Patients with incomplete registration data were excluded from the study. The two-sided Fisher exact test or Pearson chi-square test were used to compare categorical data. The unpaired Student t-test was used to analyze normally distributed continuous data, and the Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare non-normally distributed data. Parameters including systolic blood pressure (SBP), heart rate (HR), hemoglobin level (Hb), base deficit (BD), SI, MSI, and Age SI that could provide cut-off points for predicting the patients' probability of receiving MT were identified by the development of specific receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. High accuracy was defined as an area under the curve (AUC) of more than 0.9, moderate accuracy was defined as an AUC between 0.9 and 0.7, and low accuracy was defined as an AUC less than 0.7.
resultsIn addition to a significantly higher Injury Severity Score (ISS) and worse outcome, the patients requiring MT presented with a significantly higher HR and lower SBP, Hb, and BD, as well as significantly increased SI, MSI, and Age SI. Among these, only four parameters (SBP, BD, SI, and MSI) had a discriminating power of moderate accuracy (AUC > 0.7) as would be expected. A SI of 0.95 and a MSI of 1.15 were identified as the cut-off points for predicting the requirement of MT, with an AUC of 0.760 (sensitivity: 0.563 and specificity: 0.876) and 0.756 (sensitivity: 0.615 and specificity: 0.823), respectively. However, in the groups of patients with comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or coronary artery disease, the discriminating power of these three indices in predicting the requirement of MT was compromised.
conclusionsThis study reveals that the SI is moderately accurate in predicting the need for MT. However, this predictive power may be compromised in patients with HTN, DM or CAD. Moreover, the more complex calculations of MSI and Age SI failed to provide better discriminating power than the SI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.