Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27399645›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology and bioengineering2017

Microfluidic blood-brain barrier model provides in vivo-like barrier properties for drug permeability screening.

Ying I Wang, Hasan Erbil Abaci, Michael L Shuler

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 293 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
293citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
27.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

293 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 551 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. BBB-Permeable PROTACs: Where Do We Stand?ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. HumanBioactive materials · 2026
    Article
  17. Cancer metastasisFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  18. Transport Across the Blood-Brain Barrier.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

233 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ying I WangNancy E. and Peter C. Meinig School of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, 381 Kimball Hall, Ithaca, New York, 14853-7202.
Hasan Erbil AbaciNancy E. and Peter C. Meinig School of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, 381 Kimball Hall, Ithaca, New York, 14853-7202.
Michael L ShulerNancy E. and Peter C. Meinig School of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, 381 Kimball Hall, Ithaca, New York, 14853-7202.
Cornell University · US

Funding

Microphysiologial systems and low cost microfluidic platform with analyticsUH2TR000516 · NCATS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI HICKMAN, JAMES J, SHULER, MICHAEL L · 2012 to 2014
$2.9M
Colorado Clinical and Translational Science Institute (KL2)KL2TR000156 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2012 to 2013
$521k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000156NCATS NIH HHS UH2 TR000516
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficient delivery of therapeutics across the neuroprotective blood-brain barrier (BBB) remains a formidable challenge for central nervous system drug development. High-fidelity in vitro models of the BBB could facilitate effective early screening of drug candidates targeting the brain. In this study, we developed a microfluidic BBB model that is capable of mimicking in vivo BBB characteristics for a prolonged period and allows for reliable in vitro drug permeability studies under recirculating perfusion. We derived brain microvascular endothelial cells (BMECs) from human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) and cocultured them with rat primary astrocytes on the two sides of a porous membrane on a pumpless microfluidic platform for up to 10 days. The microfluidic system was designed based on the blood residence time in human brain tissues, allowing for medium recirculation at physiologically relevant perfusion rates with no pumps or external tubing, meanwhile minimizing wall shear stress to test whether shear stress is required for in vivo-like barrier properties in a microfluidic BBB model. This BBB-on-a-chip model achieved significant barrier integrity as evident by continuous tight junction formation and in vivo-like values of trans-endothelial electrical resistance (TEER). The TEER levels peaked above 4000 Ω · cm

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalBlood-Brain BarrierCell LineDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalElectric ImpedanceEquipment DesignHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesPermeabilityTissue Array Analysisblood-brain barrierhuman iPS cellsorgan on a chippermeabilityTEER

Identifiers

PMID27399645
PMCPMC6650146
OpenAlexW2501779583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.