Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27399341›Full record

ArticleNature communications2016

Plastid-nucleus communication involves calcium-modulated MAPK signalling.

Hailong Guo, Peiqiang Feng, Wei Chi, Xuwu Sun, Xiumei Xu, Yuan Li, Dongtao Ren, Congming Lu, Jean David Rochaix, Dario Leister and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Perception and processing of stress signals by plant mitochondria.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. ATP homeostasis and signaling in plants.Plant communications · 2024
    Review
  14. Regulation of chloroplast biogenesis, development, and signaling by endogenous and exogenous cues.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hailong GuoPhotosynthesis Research Center, Key Laboratory of Photobiology, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China.
Peiqiang FengPhotosynthesis Research Center, Key Laboratory of Photobiology, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China.
Wei ChiPhotosynthesis Research Center, Key Laboratory of Photobiology, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China.
Xuwu SunPhotosynthesis Research Center, Key Laboratory of Photobiology, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China.
Xiumei XuPhotosynthesis Research Center, Key Laboratory of Photobiology, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China.
Yuan LiState Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094, China.
Dongtao RenState Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094, China.
Congming LuPhotosynthesis Research Center, Key Laboratory of Photobiology, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China.
Jean David RochaixDepartments of Molecular Biology and Plant Biology, University of Geneva, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.
Dario LeisterDivision of Plant Molecular Biology (Botany), Department Biology I, Ludwig Maximilians University, 80638 Munich, Germany.
Lixin ZhangPhotosynthesis Research Center, Key Laboratory of Photobiology, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chloroplast retrograde signals play important roles in coordinating the plastid and nuclear gene expression and are critical for proper chloroplast biogenesis and for maintaining optimal chloroplast functions in response to environmental changes in plants. Until now, the signals and the mechanisms for retrograde signalling remain poorly understood. Here we identify factors that allow the nucleus to perceive stress conditions in the chloroplast and to respond accordingly by inducing or repressing specific nuclear genes encoding plastid proteins. We show that ABI4, which is known to repress the LHCB genes during retrograde signalling, is activated through phosphorylation by the MAP kinases MPK3/MPK6 and the activity of these kinases is regulated through 14-3-3ω-mediated Ca(2+)-dependent scaffolding depending on the chloroplast calcium sensor protein CAS. These findings uncover an additional mechanism in which chloroplast-modulated Ca(2+) signalling controls the MAPK pathway for the activation of critical components of the retrograde signalling chain.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, Plant14-3-3 ProteinsArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsCalcium-Binding ProteinsCalcium SignalingCell NucleusChloroplast ProteinsChloroplastsLight-Harvesting Protein ComplexesMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase KinasesMitogen-Activated Protein KinasesOrganelle BiogenesisPlants, Genetically ModifiedPlastidsSignal Transduction14-3-3omega protein, Arabidopsis14-3-3 ProteinsABI4 protein, ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsAtMPK3 protein, ArabidopsisCalcium-Binding ProteinsCAS protein, ArabidopsisChloroplast ProteinsLight-Harvesting Protein ComplexesMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase KinasesMitogen-Activated Protein KinasesMPK6 protein, ArabidopsisTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID27399341
PMCPMC4942575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.