ArticleMedicine2016
The effect of individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status on esophageal cancer survival in working-age patients in Taiwan.
Article in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Navigating preferences for a trouble-free transition: a grounded theory study among older residents in nursing homes.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced oesophageal cancer treated with surgery, radiotherapy or chemotherapy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Article
- Survival and Treatment Patterns in Stage II to III Esophageal Cancer.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Socioeconomic Deprivation Is Not Associated with Outcomes after Esophagectomy at a German High-Volume Center.Cancers · 2023Article
- The Influence of Socioeconomic Status on Esophageal Cancer in Taiwan: A Population-Based Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Association between oesophageal cancer and biomass smoke exposure: a case-control study.Ecancermedicalscience · 2022Article
- Effect of multidisciplinary team care on survival of oesophageal cancer patients: a retrospective nationwide cohort study.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- The correlations between socioeconomic status and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States: a population-based study.Translational cancer research · 2020Article
- Characterization of Esophageal Cancer and ItsAssociation with Influencing Factors in GuangzhouCity, China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Possible Predictive Markers of Response to Therapy in Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2019Article
- Social group disparities in the incidence and prognosis of oesophageal cancer.United European gastroenterology journal · 2018Review
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Esophageal cancer is the sixth leading cause of cancer mortality. More than 90% of patients with esophageal cancer in Taiwan have squamous cell carcinoma. Survival of such patients is related to socioeconomic status (SES). We studied the association between SES (individual and neighborhood) and the survival of working-age patients with esophageal cancer in Taiwan. A population-based study was conducted of 4097 patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer between 2002 and 2006. Each was traced for 5 years or until death. Individual SES was defined by enrollee job category. Neighborhood SES was based on household income and dichotomized into advantaged or disadvantaged. Multilevel logistic regression was used to compare the survival rates by SES group after adjustment for possible confounding and risk factors. Hospital and neighborhood SES were used as random effects in multilevel logistic regression. In patients younger than 65 years, 5-year overall survival rates were worst for those with low individual SES living in disadvantaged neighborhoods. After adjustment for patient characteristics, esophageal cancer patients with high individual SES had a 39% lower risk of mortality than those with low individual SES (odds ratio 0.61, 95% confidence interval 0.48-0.77). Patients living in disadvantaged areas with high individual SES were more likely to receive surgery than those with low SES (odds ratio 1.45, 95% confidence interval 1.11-1.89). Esophageal cancer patients with low individual SES have the worst 5-year survival, even with a universal healthcare system. Public health, education, and social welfare programs should address the inequality of esophageal cancer survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.