Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27399116›Full record

ArticleMedicine2016

The trends of utilization in traditional Chinese medicine in Taiwan from 2000 to 2010: A population-based study.

Yuh-Hsiang Yeh, Yiing-Jenq Chou, Nicole Huang, Christy Pu, Pesus Chou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Trends in Coprescription Among Taiwanese Children from 2002 to 2012.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yuh-Hsiang YehInstitute of Public Health, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University Linsen, Chinese Medicine, and Kunming Branch Division of Traumatology, Department of Chinese Medicine, Taipei City Hospital Institute of Hospital and Health Care Administration, School of Medicine Department of Public Health & Medical Humanities, Faculty of Medicine Community Medicine Research Center and Institute of Public Health, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yiing-Jenq Chou
Nicole Huang
Christy Pu
Pesus Chou

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is no study exploring the trend of utilization in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) from 2000 to 2010. The objective of this study was to investigate the trends of TCM utilization among 3 cross-sectional cohorts of 2000, 2005, and 2010.

methodThis study was a cross-sectional analysis of TCM utilization over time. We compared the mean TCM visits among 3 cohorts of 2000, 2005, and 2010. We derived 3 randomly sampled cohorts of nearly 1 million representative beneficiaries in each of 2000, 2005, and 2010 from National Health Insurance Research Database for this research. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to evaluate the relative relationship in categorical variables correlating to TCM users. The percentage change (% change) in mean TCM visits between 2000 and 2005 (2010) was used to evaluate the trends of TCM utilization during the period.

resultsThe ratio of TCM users increased throughout cohorts. The ratio of TCM users among women was more than that among men in all cohorts of 2000, 2005, and 2010 (adjusted odds ratio = 1.47; 1.52; 1.62). The mean TCM visits increased from 2000 to 2010. The percentage change in mean TCM visits among women was more than that among men. The group aged less than 20 years had the least percentage change in mean TCM visits (18.8%); nevertheless, the group aged 20 to 34 years had the largest change (30.2%). The high socioeconomic status group had the largest percentage change in mean visits to TCM, whereas the central region had the least percentage change. Neoplasms had the greatest increase in percentage change in mean TCM visits among all disease categories; in contrast, diseases of the respiratory system had the greatest decrease.

conclusionBoth the ratio of TCM users and mean TCM visits increased gradually from 2000 to 2005 and further to 2010. Women used TCM more than men, and this is expected to continue in the future. The high socioeconomic status group used TCM more and more over time. The picture of TCM need among different types of cancer patients should be explored in further research because of the substantial increase in TCM utilization for the disease category of neoplasms.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMedicine, Chinese TraditionalMiddle AgedTaiwanTime FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID27399116
PMCPMC5058845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.