Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27398048›Full record

ArticlePaediatrics & child health2016

Discontinuation of paediatric injectable digoxin: A loss for optimal drug therapy in children.

Pascal Bédard, Isabelle Goyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Paediatrics & child health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pascal BédardCHU Sainte Justine, Montreal, Quebec.
Isabelle GoyerCHU Sainte Justine, Montreal, Quebec.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In early 2015, the paediatric formulation of injectable digoxin (50 μg/mL) was discontinued in Canada. The only remaining injectable formulation is five times more concentrated. This recent event has major implications for paediatric hospitals all over the country. The use of a more concentrated formulation is of particular concern in low-weight infants because the required volumes of digoxin are almost impossible to draw precisely. Such a situation is problematic because of the narrow therapeutic index of digoxin. There are different ways to deal with this inconvenient situation; however, none is as efficient or safe for infants as the discontinued formulation. The authors believe it remains imperative that patients requiring intravenous digoxin be treated with the safest and most efficient formulation possible, regardless of their age or size.

Indexed as

DigoxinInfantMedication errorsNewborn infant

Identifiers

PMID27398048
PMCPMC4933069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.