ArticleClinical Medicine Insights. Oncology2016
Efficacy, Safety and Cost of Regorafenib in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in French Clinical Practice.
Article in Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Prolonged Survival Outcome in a Patient with Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with Regorafenib Plus 5-Fluorouracil: A Case Report and Literature Review.Reports (MDPI) · 2025Article
- Late-line options for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a review and evidence-based algorithm.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Efficacy and safety of regorafenib plus FOLFIRI withTherapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2025Article
- Prognostic factors for regorafenib treatment in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: A real-life retrospective multi-center study.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2023Article
- Article
- Safety and tolerability of regorafenib: a real-life experience.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2022Article
- Efficacy and safety of regorafenib and fruquintinib as third-line treatment for colorectal cancer: a narrative review.Translational cancer research · 2022Review
- Trifluridine/Tipiracil and Regorafenib in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Study at a Tertiary Oncology Center.The oncologist · 2021Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Regorafenib Monotherapy among Patients with Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in a Chinese Population: A Real-World Exploratory Study.International journal of general medicine · 2021Article
- Hospitalizations and Clinical Outcome in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer During Regorafenib or TAS-102 Therapy.Cancers · 2020Article
- Practical considerations in the use of regorafenib in metastatic colorectal cancer.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2020Review
- Research progress on common adverse events caused by targeted therapy for colorectal cancer.Oncology letters · 2018Review
- Unexpected and durable response with regorafenib in a metastatic colorectal cancer patient without KDR mutation: A case report.Medicine · 2018Article
- Evolution of regorafenib from bench to bedside in colorectal cancer: Is it an attractive option or merely a "me too" drug?Cancer management and research · 2018Review
- Incidence and risk of hematologic toxicities in cancer patients treated with regorafenib.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- Health policy: Me-too drugs with limited benefits - the tale of regorafenib for HCC.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRegorafenib is an orally administered multikinase inhibitor that has been approved for patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Even though regorafenib significantly improved survival in two international phase 3 trials (CORRECT and CONCUR), a high rate of treatment-related toxic effects and dose modifications were observed with a modest benefit. The aim of this study was to provide information concerning the efficacy, safety, and cost of regorafenib in patients with mCRC in clinical practice. MATERIAL AND
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients treated with regorafenib monotherapy for unresectable mCRC in five Franche-Comté cancer hospitals (France). The primary end point was overall survival. Secondary end points were safety and descriptive cost analyses of patients treated with regorafenib in clinical practice. Another aim of this study was to assess the impact of regorafenib prescription on the risk of hospitalization in real-life practice.
resultsFrom January 2014 to August 2014, 29 consecutive patients were enrolled. Patients were heavily pretreated and were refractory to standard chemotherapies. The primary tumor sites were the colon and the rectum for 55% and 45% of patients, respectively. Fifteen patients (51%) harbored an RAS mutation. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group - Performance Status (PS) was 0-1 for 86% of patients and 2 for 14% of patients. Nineteen patients (66%) initially received reduced doses of 120 or 80 mg/day. The median duration of treatment was 2.5 months (range, 0.13-11.4 months). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 86% of patients. The most frequent adverse events of any grade were fatigue (35%), diarrhea (20%), and hand-foot skin reaction (20%). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 10 patients (35%). Three patients (10%) were admitted to hospital due to drug-related severe adverse events. The mean cost of patient management with regorafenib for the duration of treatment was 9908 ± 8191€, and median cost was 7917€ (Interquartile range (IQR) 4469-13,042). The median overall survival was six months (95% confidence interval, five to eight months).
conclusionsThe safety and efficacy of regorafenib in heavily pretreated mCRC patients was comparable, in our study, to prospective and retrospective trials. Toxic effects were mostly manageable in an outpatient setting. Regorafenib itself represented the most important (93%) part of supported costs. Even though most side effects were manageable in an outpatient setting, severe adverse events occurred from hospitalization in 10% of patients. These data should be confirmed in a larger real-life-based cohort. Identification of predictive biomarkers is needed for mCRC patient selection for regorafenib treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.