Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27398042›Full record

ArticleClinical Medicine Insights. Oncology2016

Efficacy, Safety and Cost of Regorafenib in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in French Clinical Practice.

Fabien Calcagno, Sabrina Lenoble, Zaher Lakkis, Thierry Nguyen, Samuel Limat, Christophe Borg, Marine Jary, Stefano Kim, Virginie Nerich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Efficacy and safety of regorafenib plus FOLFIRI withTherapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Safety and tolerability of regorafenib: a real-life experience.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fabien CalcagnoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Besançon University Hospital, Besançon, France.; INSERM, UMR 1098, Besançon, France.; University of Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, UMR 1098, SFR IBCT, Besançon, France.; Clinical Investigation Center, Inserm CIC 1431, Besançon, France.
Sabrina LenoblePharmacy Department, Besançon University Hospital, Besançon, France.
Zaher LakkisLiver Transplantation and Digestive Surgery Unit, Besançon University Hospital, Besançon, France.
Thierry NguyenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Besançon University Hospital, Besançon, France.
Samuel LimatUniversity of Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, UMR 1098, SFR IBCT, Besançon, France.; Pharmacy Department, Besançon University Hospital, Besançon, France.
Christophe BorgDepartment of Medical Oncology, Besançon University Hospital, Besançon, France.; INSERM, UMR 1098, Besançon, France.; University of Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, UMR 1098, SFR IBCT, Besançon, France.; Clinical Investigation Center, Inserm CIC 1431, Besançon, France.
Marine JaryDepartment of Medical Oncology, Besançon University Hospital, Besançon, France.; INSERM, UMR 1098, Besançon, France.; University of Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, UMR 1098, SFR IBCT, Besançon, France.; Clinical Investigation Center, Inserm CIC 1431, Besançon, France.
Stefano KimDepartment of Medical Oncology, Besançon University Hospital, Besançon, France.; Clinical Investigation Center, Inserm CIC 1431, Besançon, France.
Virginie NerichINSERM, UMR 1098, Besançon, France.; University of Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, UMR 1098, SFR IBCT, Besançon, France.; Pharmacy Department, Besançon University Hospital, Besançon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRegorafenib is an orally administered multikinase inhibitor that has been approved for patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Even though regorafenib significantly improved survival in two international phase 3 trials (CORRECT and CONCUR), a high rate of treatment-related toxic effects and dose modifications were observed with a modest benefit. The aim of this study was to provide information concerning the efficacy, safety, and cost of regorafenib in patients with mCRC in clinical practice. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients treated with regorafenib monotherapy for unresectable mCRC in five Franche-Comté cancer hospitals (France). The primary end point was overall survival. Secondary end points were safety and descriptive cost analyses of patients treated with regorafenib in clinical practice. Another aim of this study was to assess the impact of regorafenib prescription on the risk of hospitalization in real-life practice.

resultsFrom January 2014 to August 2014, 29 consecutive patients were enrolled. Patients were heavily pretreated and were refractory to standard chemotherapies. The primary tumor sites were the colon and the rectum for 55% and 45% of patients, respectively. Fifteen patients (51%) harbored an RAS mutation. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group - Performance Status (PS) was 0-1 for 86% of patients and 2 for 14% of patients. Nineteen patients (66%) initially received reduced doses of 120 or 80 mg/day. The median duration of treatment was 2.5 months (range, 0.13-11.4 months). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 86% of patients. The most frequent adverse events of any grade were fatigue (35%), diarrhea (20%), and hand-foot skin reaction (20%). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 10 patients (35%). Three patients (10%) were admitted to hospital due to drug-related severe adverse events. The mean cost of patient management with regorafenib for the duration of treatment was 9908 ± 8191€, and median cost was 7917€ (Interquartile range (IQR) 4469-13,042). The median overall survival was six months (95% confidence interval, five to eight months).

conclusionsThe safety and efficacy of regorafenib in heavily pretreated mCRC patients was comparable, in our study, to prospective and retrospective trials. Toxic effects were mostly manageable in an outpatient setting. Regorafenib itself represented the most important (93%) part of supported costs. Even though most side effects were manageable in an outpatient setting, severe adverse events occurred from hospitalization in 10% of patients. These data should be confirmed in a larger real-life-based cohort. Identification of predictive biomarkers is needed for mCRC patient selection for regorafenib treatment.

Indexed as

costefficacymetastatic colorectal cancerregorafenibsafety

Identifiers

PMID27398042
PMCPMC4933532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.