Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27397894›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2016

Identification of a Retinal Circuit for Recurrent Suppression Using Indirect Electrical Imaging.

Martin Greschner, Alexander K Heitman, Greg D Field, Peter H Li, Daniel Ahn, Alexander Sher, Alan M Litke, E J Chichilnisky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Retinal ganglion cells encode the direction of motion outside their classical receptive field.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Synaptic inputs to broad thorny ganglion cells in macaque retina.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Electrical Coupling of Heterotypic Ganglion Cells in the Mammalian Retina.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Martin GreschnerDepartment of Neuroscience, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg 26129, Germany; Systems Neurobiology, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA. Electronic address: martin.greschner@uni-oldenburg.de.
Alexander K HeitmanSystems Neurobiology, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Greg D FieldSystems Neurobiology, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA; Department of Neurobiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Peter H LiSystems Neurobiology, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Daniel AhnSystems Neurobiology, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Alexander SherSanta Cruz Institute for Particle Physics, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA.
Alan M LitkeSanta Cruz Institute for Particle Physics, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA.
E J ChichilniskySystems Neurobiology, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA; Departments of Neurosurgery and Ophthalmology and Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.

Funding

Neurosciences Graduate Training ProgramT32NS061847 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Brenda L Bloodgood · 2008 to 2026
$7.7M
Receptive Field Mosaics of Midget, Parasol and Small Bi-Stratified Ganglion CellsR01EY017992 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHICHILNISKY, EDUARDO · 2007 to 2014
$3.2M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY017992NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS061847
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the function of modulatory interneuron networks is a major challenge, because such networks typically operate over long spatial scales and involve many neurons of different types. Here, we use an indirect electrical imaging method to reveal the function of a spatially extended, recurrent retinal circuit composed of two cell types. This recurrent circuit produces peripheral response suppression of early visual signals in the primate magnocellular visual pathway. We identify a type of polyaxonal amacrine cell physiologically via its distinctive electrical signature, revealed by electrical coupling with ON parasol retinal ganglion cells recorded using a large-scale multi-electrode array. Coupling causes the amacrine cells to fire spikes that propagate radially over long distances, producing GABA-ergic inhibition of other ON parasol cells recorded near the amacrine cell axonal projections. We propose and test a model for the function of this amacrine cell type, in which the extra-classical receptive field of ON parasol cells is formed by reciprocal inhibition from other ON parasol cells in the periphery, via the electrically coupled amacrine cell network.

Indexed as

Amacrine CellsAnimalsElectrophysiological PhenomenaInterneuronsMacaca fascicularisMacaca mulattaRetinaVisual Pathways

Identifiers

PMID27397894
PMCPMC5182067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.