ReviewMicrobiologyOpen2016
Recent developments in detection and enumeration of waterborne bacteria: a retrospective minireview.
Review in MicrobiologyOpen, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Progress of Rapid Detection Technology for Aquatic Microorganisms: A Comprehensive Review.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Comparative Evaluation of Electrochemical and Fluorescent Readouts for Immunomagnetically Captured Waterborne Pathogens Using a Biochip with Bifunctional Magnetic Nanoparticles.ACS measurement science au · 2026Article
- Recent developments in waterborne pathogen detection technologies.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2025Review
- Navigating the complex landscape of waterborne disease research.Journal of water and health · 2025Review
- Advancing Pathogen Identification: The Role of Digital PCR in Enhancing Diagnostic Power in Different Settings.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Development of an Immunocapture-Based Polymeric Optical Fiber Sensor for Bacterial Detection in Water.Polymers · 2024Article
- Evaluation of a novel lysis-based sample processing method to optimize Vibrio vulnificus detecting by loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay.BMC microbiology · 2024Article
- Simultaneous enumeration of yeast and bacterial cells in the context of industrial bioprocesses.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2024Article
- Waterborne pathogens detection technologies: advances, challenges, and future perspectives.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Review
- Molecular Diagnostic Tools Applied for Assessing Microbial Water Quality.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Microfluidic One-Pot Digital Droplet FISH Using LNA/DNA Molecular Beacons for Bacteria Detection and Absolute Quantification.Biosensors · 2022Article
- Amplification of Femtograms of Bacterial DNA Within 3 h Using a Digital Microfluidics Platform for MinION Sequencing.ACS omega · 2021Article
- Multiplexed colorimetric detection of SARS-CoV-2 and other pathogens in wastewater on a 3D printed integrated microfluidic chip.Sensors and actuators. B, Chemical · 2021Article
- BCIG-SMAC medium and PMA-qPCR for differential detection of viableIranian journal of microbiology · 2021Article
- Study of indiscriminate distribution of restrained antimicrobial resistome of different environmental niches.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- A novel method for rapid and sensitive detection of viable Escherichia coli cells using UV-induced PMA-coupled quantitative PCR.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2020Article
- Early detection and classification of live bacteria using time-lapse coherent imaging and deep learning.Light, science & applications · 2020Article
- Fluorescent Materials With Aggregation-Induced Emission Characteristics for Array-Based Sensing Assay.Frontiers in chemistry · 2020Review
- Simple lysis of bacterial cells for DNA-based diagnostics using hydrophilic ionic liquids.Scientific reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Waterborne diseases have emerged as global health problems and their rapid and sensitive detection in environmental water samples is of great importance. Bacterial identification and enumeration in water samples is significant as it helps to maintain safe drinking water for public consumption. Culture-based methods are laborious, time-consuming, and yield false-positive results, whereas viable but nonculturable (VBNCs) microorganisms cannot be recovered. Hence, numerous methods have been developed for rapid detection and quantification of waterborne pathogenic bacteria in water. These rapid methods can be classified into nucleic acid-based, immunology-based, and biosensor-based detection methods. This review summarizes the principle and current state of rapid methods for the monitoring and detection of waterborne bacterial pathogens. Rapid methods outlined are polymerase chain reaction (PCR), digital droplet PCR, real-time PCR, multiplex PCR, DNA microarray, Next-generation sequencing (pyrosequencing, Illumina technology and genomics), and fluorescence in situ hybridization that are categorized as nucleic acid-based methods. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and immunofluorescence are classified into immunology-based methods. Optical, electrochemical, and mass-based biosensors are grouped into biosensor-based methods. Overall, these methods are sensitive, specific, time-effective, and important in prevention and diagnosis of waterborne bacterial diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.