Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27397549›Full record

ArticleAIDS care2017

Transactional sex and the challenges to safer sexual behaviors: a study among male sex workers in Chennai, India.

Katie B Biello, Beena E Thomas, Blake E Johnson, Elizabeth F Closson, Pandiaraja Navakodi, A Dhanalakshmi, Sunil Menon, Kenneth H Mayer, Steven A Safren, Matthew J Mimiaga

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS care, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Implications of Migration Patterns and Sex Work on Access to Health Services and Key Health Outcomes: A Qualitative Study on Male Migrant Sex Workers in London.International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Katie B Bielloa Institute for Community Health Promotion, Brown University , Providence , RI , USA.
Beena E Thomasd National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis (NIRT) , Chennai , India.
Blake E Johnsonc The Fenway Institute, Fenway Health , Boston , MA , USA.
Elizabeth F Clossonc The Fenway Institute, Fenway Health , Boston , MA , USA.
Pandiaraja Navakodid National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis (NIRT) , Chennai , India.
A Dhanalakshmid National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis (NIRT) , Chennai , India.
Sunil Menonf Sahodaran , Chennai , India.
Kenneth H Mayerc The Fenway Institute, Fenway Health , Boston , MA , USA.
Steven A Safrenc The Fenway Institute, Fenway Health , Boston , MA , USA.
Matthew J Mimiagaa Institute for Community Health Promotion, Brown University , Providence , RI , USA.
Fenway Health · USNational Institute of Research in Tuberculosis · INHarvard Global Health Institute · USSahodaran · INUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

Technology for HIV Prevention Among Vulnerable Men in IndiaR21DA033720 · NIDA · FENWAY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER · PI MIMIAGA, MATTHEW JAMES · 2011 to 2012
$465k
NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA033720
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Male sex workers (MSW) are a significant but invisible population in India who are at risk for HIV/sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Few studies from India have documented HIV risk factors and motivations for sex work in this population. Between 2013 and 2014, a community-based convenience sample of 100 MSW in Chennai (south India) completed a baseline risk assessment as part of a behavioral intervention. Participants were ≥18 years, and reported current sex work. We report medians and proportions, and Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney and chi-square tests are used to examine differences between sex work and sexual behavior measures by income source. Participants were engaged in sex work for 5.0 years (IQR = 2.3-10.0), and earned 3000 (IQR = 2000-8000) Rupees (<50 USD) per month from sex work. Sixty-four percent reported ever testing for HIV and 20.2% for any STI. The most common reasons for starting sex work were money (83.0%) and pleasure (56.0%). Compared to participants with an additional source of income, those whose only source of income was sex work reported more male clients in the past month (10.0 vs. 6.0, p = .017), as well as more condomless anal sex acts with male clients (8.0 vs. 5.0, p = .008). Nearly 70.0% were offered more money not to use a condom during sex with a client, and 74.2% reported accepting more money not to use a condom. Three-quarters reported having experienced difficulty using condoms with clients. MSW in India engage in high levels of sexual risk for HIV/STIs. Money appears to be a driving factor for engaging in sex work and condomless sex with clients. HIV prevention interventions with MSW should focus on facilitating skills that will support their ability to negotiate sexual safety in the context of monetary disincentives.

Indexed as

IncomeAdultCondomsCross-Sectional StudiesHIV InfectionsHumansIndiaMaleMotivationNegotiatingPleasureSexual BehaviorSexually Transmitted DiseasesSex WorkSex WorkersUnsafe SexHIV preventionIndiamale sex workersMen who have sex with mensexual risk

Identifiers

PMID27397549
PMCPMC5784832
OpenAlexW2463159999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.