Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27397507›Full record

ArticleCell2016

Pre-assembled Nuclear Pores Insert into the Nuclear Envelope during Early Development.

Bernhard Hampoelz, Marie-Therese Mackmull, Pedro Machado, Paolo Ronchi, Khanh Huy Bui, Nicole Schieber, Rachel Santarella-Mellwig, Aleksandar Necakov, Amparo Andrés-Pons, Jean Marc Philippe and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 127 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Structure, function and assembly of nuclear pore complexes.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. On the origin of the nucleus: a hypothesis.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2023
    Review

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Bernhard HampoelzEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Structural and Computational Biology Unit, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
Marie-Therese MackmullEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Structural and Computational Biology Unit, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
Pedro MachadoEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Electron Microscopy Core Facility, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
Paolo RonchiEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Electron Microscopy Core Facility, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
Khanh Huy BuiEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Structural and Computational Biology Unit, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
Nicole SchieberEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
Rachel Santarella-MellwigEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Electron Microscopy Core Facility, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
Aleksandar NecakovEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Structural and Computational Biology Unit, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
Amparo Andrés-PonsEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Structural and Computational Biology Unit, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
Jean Marc PhilippeAix-Marseille Université, CNRS, IBDM UMR 7288, 13009 Marseille, France.
Thomas LecuitAix-Marseille Université, CNRS, IBDM UMR 7288, 13009 Marseille, France.
Yannick SchwabEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Electron Microscopy Core Facility, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany; European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
Martin BeckEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Structural and Computational Biology Unit, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany; European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany. Electronic address: martin.beck@embl.de.
European Molecular Biology Laboratory · DEEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory · DEAix-Marseille Université · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

Resource Component: Acquisition, maintenance and distribution of Drosophila stocksP40OD018537 · OD · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI Annette L. Parks · 2014 to 2026
$13.5M
European Research Council 309271NIH HHS P40 OD018537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) span the nuclear envelope (NE) and mediate nucleocytoplasmic transport. In metazoan oocytes and early embryos, NPCs reside not only within the NE, but also at some endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane sheets, termed annulate lamellae (AL). Although a role for AL as NPC storage pools has been discussed, it remains controversial whether and how they contribute to the NPC density at the NE. Here, we show that AL insert into the NE as the ER feeds rapid nuclear expansion in Drosophila blastoderm embryos. We demonstrate that NPCs within AL resemble pore scaffolds that mature only upon insertion into the NE. We delineate a topological model in which NE openings are critical for AL uptake that nevertheless occurs without compromising the permeability barrier of the NE. We finally show that this unanticipated mode of pore insertion is developmentally regulated and operates prior to gastrulation.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlastodermDrosophilaEmbryonic DevelopmentEmbryo, NonmammalianEndoplasmic ReticulumGastrulationNuclear EnvelopeNuclear PoreOocytes

Identifiers

PMID27397507
PMCPMC4967450
OpenAlexW2464250025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.