Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27397040›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2016

Toxicity and quality of life after adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for women with high-risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC-3): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial.

Stephanie M de Boer, Melanie E Powell, Linda Mileshkin, Dionyssios Katsaros, Paul Bessette, Christine Haie-Meder, Petronella B Ottevanger, Jonathan A Ledermann, Pearly Khaw, Alessandro Colombo and 11 more

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 71 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00411138 phase3unknown statusnot on this map

Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing Concurrent Chemoradiation and Adjuvant Chemotherapy With Pelvic Radiation Alone in High Risk and Advanced Stage Endometrial Carcinoma: PORTEC-3

TypeinterventionalSponsorLeiden UniversityRan2006 to 2024Enrolled670ConditionsEndometrial CancerArmsRadiation Therapy, cisplatin, carboplatin, Paclitaxel
NCT03935256 phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Phase II Study of Concurrent and Sequential Carboplatin and Paclitaxel With Adjuvant Radiotherapy for High Risk Endometrial Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorLoyola UniversityRan2019 to 2024Enrolled24ConditionsEndometrial CancerArmsCarboplatin and Paclitaxel, Radiation Therapy
NCT07435623 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Assessment of Late Gastrointestinal and Genitourinary Toxicities in Cervical and Endometrial Cancer Requiring Postoperative IMRT and/or Brachytherapy

TypeobservationalSponsorTata Memorial HospitalRan2025 to 2026Enrolled300ConditionsEndometrial Cancer, Cervix Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Efficacy and Toxicity of Adjuvant Therapies for High-Risk Endometrial Cancer in Stage I-III: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. [Clinical implications of the PORTEC-3 trial for the treatment of high-risk endometrial cancer].Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2020
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Clinical consequences of upfront pathology review in the randomised PORTEC-3 trial for high-risk endometrial cancer.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2018
    Trial
  12. [Radiochemotherapy improves failure-free survival in stage III endometrial cancer : Final results of the PORTEC-3 trial].Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2017
    Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Sexual symptoms in relation to curative pelvic radiotherapy in gynecological cancer patients.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Stephanie M de BoerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands. Electronic address: s.m.de_boer.onco@lumc.nl.
Melanie E PowellDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Linda MileshkinDivision of Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Dionyssios KatsarosDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Gynecologic Oncology, Città della Salute and S Anna Hospital, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Paul BessetteNCIC-CTG, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Christine Haie-MederDepartment of Radiotherapy, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Petronella B OttevangerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Jonathan A LedermannCancer Research UK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK.
Pearly KhawDivision of Radiation Oncology & Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Alessandro ColomboDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera della Provincia di Lecco, Italy.
Anthony FylesNCIC-CTG, Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Marie-Helene BaronDepartment of Radiotherapy, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Besançon, Besançon, France.
Henry C KitchenerInstitute of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Hans W NijmanDepartment of Gynaecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Roy F KruitwagenDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, and GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Remi A NoutDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Karen W Verhoeven-AdemaComprehensive Cancer Center The Netherlands, Leiden, Netherlands.
Vincent T SmitDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Hein PutterDepartment of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Carien L CreutzbergDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
PORTEC study group

Funding

Cancer Research UK 15953Cancer Research UK 8659
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAbout 15% of patients with endometrial cancer have high-risk features and are at increased risk of distant metastases and endometrial cancer-related death. We designed the PORTEC-3 trial to investigate the benefit of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone for women with high-risk endometrial cancer.

methodsPORTEC-3 was a multicentre, open-label, randomised, international trial. Women with high-risk endometrial cancer were randomly allocated (1:1) to radiotherapy alone (48·6 Gy) in 1·8 Gy fractions five times a week or chemoradiotherapy (two cycles concurrent cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) and four adjuvant cycles of carboplatin area under the curve [AUC] 5 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2)) using a biased coin minimisation procedure with stratification for participating centre, lymphadenectomy, stage of cancer, and histological type. The primary endpoints of the PORTEC-3 trial were overall survival and failure-free survival analysed in the intention-to-treat population. This analysis focuses on 2-year toxicity and health-related quality of life as secondary endpoints; analysis was done according to treatment received. Health-related quality of life was assessed with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) the cervix cancer module and chemotherapy and neuropathy subscales of the ovarian cancer module at baseline, after radiotherapy and at 6, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months after randomisation. Adverse events were graded with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0. The study was closed on Dec 20, 2013, after achieving complete accrual, and follow-up remains ongoing for the primary outcomes analysis. This trial is registered with ISRCTN.com, number ISRCTN14387080, and with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00411138.

findingsBetween Sept 15, 2006, and Dec 20, 2013, 686 women were randomly allocated in the PORTEC-3 trial. Of these, 660 met eligibility criteria, and 570 (86%) were evaluable for health-related quality of life. Median follow-up was 42·3 months (IQR 25·8-55·1). At completion of radiotherapy and at 6 months, EORTC QLQ-C30 functioning scales were significantly lower (worse functioning) and health-related quality of life symptom scores higher (worse symptoms) for the chemoradiotherapy group compared with radiotherapy alone, improving with time. At 12 and 24 months, global health or quality of life was similar between groups, whereas physical functioning scores remained slightly lower in patients who received chemoradiotherapy compared with patients who received radiotherapy alone. At 24 months, 48 (25%) of 194 patients in the chemoradiotherapy group reported severe tingling or numbness compared with 11 (6%) of 170 patients in the radiotherapy alone group (p<0·0001). Grade 2 or worse adverse events were found during treatment in 309 (94%) of 327 patients in the chemoradiotherapy group versus 145 (44%) of 326 patients in the radiotherapy alone group, and grade 3 or worse events were found in 198 (61%) of 327 patients in the chemoradiotherapy group versus 42 (13%) of 326 patients in the radiotherapy alone group (p<0·0001), with most of the grade 3 adverse events being haematological (45%). At 12 and 24 months, no significant differences in grade 3 or worse adverse events were found between groups; only grade 2 or higher sensory neuropathy adverse events persisted at 24 months (25 [10%] of 240 patients in the chemoradiotherapy group vs one [<1%] of 247 patients in the radiotherapy alone group; p<0·0001).

interpretationDespite the increased physician and patient-reported toxicities, this schedule of adjuvant chemotherapy given during and after radiotherapy in patients with high-risk endometrial cancer is feasible, with rapid recovery after treatment, but with persistence of patient-reported sensory neurological symptoms in 25% of patients. We await the analysis of primary endpoints before final conclusions are made.

fundingDutch Cancer Society, Cancer Research UK, National Health and Medical Research Council, Project Grant, Cancer Australia Grant, Italian Medicines Agency, and Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdenocarcinoma, Clear CellAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarboplatinCase-Control StudiesChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantCisplatinCystadenocarcinoma, SerousEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGastrointestinal DiseasesHematologic DiseasesHumansLymphatic MetastasisCarboplatinCisplatinPaclitaxel

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.