ArticleInfection ecology & epidemiology2016
Comparison of whole genome sequencing typing results and epidemiological contact information from outbreaks of Salmonella Dublin in Swedish cattle herds.
Article in Infection ecology & epidemiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Using SNP addresses forEpidemiology and infection · 2023Article
- Semi-Quantitative Biosecurity Assessment Framework Targeting Prevention of the Introduction and Establishment ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Epidemiological Analysis on the Occurrence ofMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- Clonal relation betweenFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023Article
- A retrospective and regional approach assessing the genomic diversity ofNAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Whole-Genome Investigation ofMicroorganisms · 2022Article
- Epidemiological Analysis of Salmonella enterica subsp.Microbiology spectrum · 2021Article
- Monitoring the Microevolution ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Epidemiology ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2020Article
- Genomic Investigation of the Emergence of Invasive Multidrug-Resistant Salmonella enterica Serovar Dublin in Humans and Animals in Canada.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2019Article
- Disentangling a complex nationwideEuro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2019Article
- Prevalence and genomic characteristics of zoonotic gastro-intestinal pathogens and ESBL/pAmpC producingInfection ecology & epidemiology · 2019Article
- Transforming bacterial disease surveillance and investigation using whole-genome sequence to probe the trace.Frontiers of medicine · 2018Review
- Investigation of a Carbapenemase-producingAntimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhole genome sequencing (WGS) is becoming a routine tool for infectious disease outbreak investigations. The Swedish situation provides an excellent opportunity to test the usefulness of WGS for investigation of outbreaks with Salmonella Dublin (S. Dublin) as epidemiological investigations are always performed when Salmonella is detected in livestock production, and index isolates from all detected herds are stored and therefore available for analysis. This study was performed to evaluate WGS as a tool in forward and backward tracings from herds infected with S. Dublin. MATERIAL AND
methodsIn this study, 28 isolates from 26 cattle herds were analysed and the WGS results were compared with results from the epidemiological investigations, for example, information on contacts between herds. The isolates originated from herds in three different outbreaks separated geographically and to some extent also in time, and from the only region in Sweden where S. Dublin is endemic (Öland).
resultsThe WGS results of isolates from the three non-endemic regions were reliably separated from each other and from the endemic isolates. Within the outbreaks, herds with known epidemiological contacts generally showed smaller differences between isolates as compared to when there were no known epidemiological contacts.
conclusionThe results indicate that WGS can provide valuable supplemental information in S. Dublin outbreak investigations. The resolution of the WGS was sufficient to distinguish isolates from the different outbreaks and provided additional information to the investigations within an outbreak.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.