ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2017
Hypokalemia is a biochemical signal of poor prognosis for acute paraquat poisoning within 4 hours.
Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Role of serum glucose/potassium ratio in assessing poisoning severity and adverse outcomes in patients with acute aluminum phosphide poisoning.Toxicology reports · 2025Article
- Risk factors and optimal predictive scoring system of mortality for children with acute paraquat poisoning.World journal of clinical cases · 2022Article
- Development and Validation of a Radiomics Nomogram for Prognosis Prediction of Patients with Acute Paraquat Poisoning: A Retrospective Cohort Study.BioMed research international · 2021Article
- A retrospective analysis of leucocyte count as a strong predictor of survival for patients with acute paraquat poisoning.PloS one · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Anecdotal reports have suggested that hypokalemia is an independent predictor of mortality in patients with acute paraquat poisoning. However, the clinical significance of hypokalemia has not been systematically investigated in the early stage of paraquat poisoning. This study aimed to evaluate whether initial hypokalemia is a good predictor of mortality in patients with acute paraquat poisoning within 4 h. We retrospectively analyzed patients who were admitted to the emergency department after paraquat poisoning between September 2012 and January 2015. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were recorded, and the prognostic significance of hypokalemia was analyzed. A total of 120 patients were included. The 60-day mortality was 71.7 %. Serum potassium concentrations were significantly lower in non-survivors (3.1 ± 0.5 mmol/L) than in survivors (3.8 ± 0.3 mmol/L, P < 0.001). Independent predictors of death were amount of paraquat ingested (hazard ratio 1.005; 95 % confidence interval 1.002-1.007), serum potassium (0.498, 0.277-0.897), bicarbonate (0.934, 0.876-0.995), and white blood cell count (1.032, 1.001-1.065). For receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, serum potassium had an area under the curve of 0.852 (95 % confidence interval 0.784-0.920, P < 0.001), and the best cutoff value was 3.5 mmol/L (sensitivity, 88.2 %; specificity, 75.6 % in predicting survivors). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that decreased serum potassium concentrations were associated with an increase in 60-day mortality (P < 0.001). Hypokalemia may be a reliable predictor in evaluating prognosis in paraquat poisoning within 4 h. The mechanism is not clear, and further studies verifying the precise mechanism of hypokalemia are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.