Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27394929›Full record

ArticleAtencion primaria2017

Prevalence of intimate partner violence in Spain: A national cross-sectional survey in primary care.

Isabel Ruiz-Pérez, Vicenta Escribà-Agüir, Isabel Montero-Piñar, Carmen Vives-Cases, Miguel Rodríguez-Barranco, G6 for the Study of Gender Violence in Spain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Atencion primaria, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Relationship between Sexual Violence and the Health of Spanish Women-A National Population-Based Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Understanding marital violence: a study in grounded theory.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Isabel Ruiz-PérezAndalusian School of Public Health, Granada, Spain; Epidemiology and Public Health Network Biomedical Research Consortium (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain; Biosanitary Institute of Granada (ibs.GRANADA), Spain. Electronic address: isabel.ruiz.easp@juntadeandalucia.es.
Vicenta Escribà-AgüirDepartment of Nursing, University of Valencia, Spain; Epidemiology and Public Health Network Biomedical Research Consortium (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain; Center for Public Health Research, Valencia, Spain.
Isabel Montero-PiñarDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Valencia, Spain; Epidemiology and Public Health Network Biomedical Research Consortium (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Carmen Vives-CasesDepartment of Public Health, University of Alicante, Spain.
Miguel Rodríguez-BarrancoAndalusian School of Public Health, Granada, Spain; Epidemiology and Public Health Network Biomedical Research Consortium (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain; Biosanitary Institute of Granada (ibs.GRANADA), Spain.
G6 for the Study of Gender Violence in Spain

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectives(1) To analyze the prevalence of Intimate Partner Violence by types. (2) To examine the relationship between sociodemographic characteristics and Intimate Partner Violence.

designCross-sectional study using a self-administered questionnaire.

settingPrimary Healthcare centers in Spain.

participants10,322 women (18-70 years) attending Primary Healthcare centers. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: A compound index was calculated based on frequency, types, and duration of Intimate Partner Violence. Multivariable adjusted logistic regression models were used to identify the sociodemographic factors, which were independently associated with each Intimate Partner Violence category.

resultsThe prevalence of Intimate Partner Violence was 24.8%. For the physical only category, no differences were observed regarding education or employment status, and women with the highest income have less risk. For the psychological only category, no differences were observed according to the income level. The risk increases as the education level decreases, and the greatest frequency of only psychological Intimate Partner Violence was observed in women who were unemployed or students. For both the physical and psychological category of Intimate Partner Violence, a clear risk increase is observed as income and education levels decrease. Retired women showed the highest frequency of this violence category.

conclusionThe results show that Intimate Partner Violence affects women of all social strata, but the frequency and Intimate Partner Violence category will vary according to the socio-economic.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIntimate Partner ViolenceMiddle AgedSelf ReportSpainYoung AdultAbuso conyugalBattered womenEspañaFactores socioeconómicosMujeres maltratadasPrevalencePrevalenciaSocioeconomic factorsSpainSpouse abuse

Identifiers

PMID27394929
PMCPMC6876042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.