ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2016
How does state marijuana policy affect US youth? Medical marijuana laws, marijuana use and perceived harmfulness: 1991-2014.
Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
92 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- How adolescent cannabis use reshapes the developing brain - a systematic review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Impact evaluations of drug decriminalisation and legal regulation on drug use, health and social harms: a systematic review.BMJ open · 2020Pooled it
- Does liberalisation of cannabis policy influence levels of use in adolescents and young adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2019Pooled it
- Medical marijuana laws and adolescent marijuana use in the United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2018Pooled it
- Day-level shifts in social contexts during youth cannabis use treatment.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology · 2021Trial
- Effects of Messaging and Psychological Reactance on Marijuana Craving.Substance use & misuse · 2019Trial
- Appetitive startle modulation in the human laboratory predicts Cannabis craving in the natural environment.Psychopharmacology · 2018Trial
- Attitudes of Patients with Non-Psychotic Mental Disorders Towards Cannabis After Its Legalization-Comparison with Patients Before Legalization.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Perceived Risk of Fentanyl Use Among US Adolescents.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- A longitudinal mediated examination of legal, commercial, and individual determinants of cannabis and derived cannabis use behaviors and consequences among US young adults.Addictive behaviors · 2026Article
- U.S. State Marijuana and Delta-8-Tetrahydrocannabinol Laws and Delta-8-Tetrahydrocannabinol Use.American journal of preventive medicine · 2025Article
- Content Analysis of Cannabis Discourses on Twitter/X in the U.S.AJPM focus · 2025Article
- Differences in Cannabis and Cannabidiol Attitudes, Perceptions, and Behaviors Between US Adolescents Receiving Mood Disorder Treatment and Their Parents Across Legal Contexts.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Gender differences in cannabis outcomes after recreational legalization: a United States repeated cross-sectional study, 2008-2017.International journal of mental health and addiction · 2025Article
- Cross-sectional analysis of cannabis use at work in the USA: differences by occupational risk level and state-level cannabis laws.BMJ public health · 2025Article
- In harm's way: Do college students' beliefs about cannabis put them at risk for use?Journal of American college health : J of ACH · 2024Article
- Substance Use and Educational Impacts in Youth With and Without Chronic Illness.American journal of preventive medicine · 2024Article
- State-Level Recreational Cannabis Legalization Is Not Differentially Associated with Cannabis Risk Perception Among Children: A Multilevel Regression Analysis.Cannabis and cannabinoid research · 2024Article
- Health, safety, and socioeconomic impacts of cannabis liberalization laws: An evidence and gap map.Campbell systematic reviews · 2023Article
- Understanding the differential effect of local socio-economic conditions on the relation between prescription opioid supply and drug overdose deaths in US counties.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2023Article
32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsTo test, among US students: (1) whether perceived harmfulness of marijuana has changed over time, (2) whether perceived harmfulness of marijuana changed post-passage of state medical marijuana laws (MML) compared with pre-passage; and (3) whether perceived harmfulness of marijuana statistically mediates and/or modifies the relation between MML and marijuana use as a function of grade level.
designCross-sectional nationally representative surveys of US students, conducted annually, 1991-2014, in the Monitoring the Future study.
settingSurveys conducted in schools in all coterminous states; 21 states passed MML between 1996 and 2014.
participantsThe sample included 1 134 734 adolescents in 8th, 10th and 12th grades. MEASUREMENTS: State passage of MML; perceived harmfulness of marijuana use (perceiving great or moderate risk to health from smoking marijuana occasionally versus slight or no risk); and marijuana use (prior 30 days). Data were analyzed using time-varying multi-level regression modeling.
findingsThe perceived harmfulness of marijuana has decreased significantly since 1991 (from an estimated 84.0% in 1991 to 53.8% in 2014, P < 0.01) and, across time, perceived harmfulness was lower in states that passed MML [odds ratio (OR) = 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.75-0.97]. In states with MML, perceived harmfulness of marijuana increased among 8th graders after MML passage (OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.08-1.36), while marijuana use decreased (OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.72-0.92). Results were null for other grades, and for all grades combined. Increases in perceived harmfulness among 8th graders after MML passage was associated with ~33% of the decrease in use. When adolescents were stratified by perceived harmfulness, use in 8th graders decreased to a greater extent among those who perceived marijuana as harmful.
conclusionsWhile perceived harmfulness of marijuana use appears to be decreasing nationally among adolescents in the United States, the passage of medical marijuana laws (MML) is associated with increases in perceived harmfulness among young adolescents and marijuana use has decreased among those who perceive marijuana to be harmful after passage of MML.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.