Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27393869›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2016

The good, the bad, and the hungry: how the central brain codes odor valence to facilitate food approach in Drosophila.

Silke Sachse, Jennifer Beshel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Olfactory coding in honeybees.Cell and tissue research · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Genetic Analysis of Mosquito Detection of Humans.Current opinion in insect science · 2017
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Silke SachseDepartment of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.
Jennifer BeshelCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, United States. Electronic address: beshel@cshl.edu.

Funding

The role of the dNPF brain circuit in coding food odor valueR01DC013071 · NIDCD · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI DUBNAU, JOSHUA T · 2014 to 2018
$1.9M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013071
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All animals must eat in order to survive but first they must successfully locate and appraise food resources in a manner consonant with their needs. To accomplish this, external sensory information, in particular olfactory food cues, need to be detected and appropriately categorized. Recent advances in Drosophila point to the existence of parallel processing circuits within the central brain that encode odor valence, supporting approach and avoidance behaviors. Strikingly, many elements within these neural systems are subject to modification as a function of the fly's satiety state. In this review we describe those advances and their potential impact on the decision to feed.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainDrosophilaHungerOdorantsOlfactory Perception

Identifiers

PMID27393869
PMCPMC5056820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.