ArticleInternational journal of cardiology2016
Heart failure in Tanzania and Sweden: Comparative characterization and prognosis in the Tanzania Heart Failure (TaHeF) study and the Swedish Heart Failure Registry (SwedeHF).
Article in International journal of cardiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characteristics, use of guideline-recommended medical therapies and clinical outcomes of patients with heart failure not enrolled in a quality registry: a comparison with the Swedish Heart Failure Registry.European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes · 2025Observational
- Primary Causes and Direct Medical Cost of Heart Failure Among Adults Admitted with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure in a Public Tertiary Hospital, Kenya.Global heart · 2025Article
- Anemia in Heart Failure: A Perspective from 20-Year Bibliometric Analysis.International journal of general medicine · 2024Article
- Characterization of Non-Ischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy in a Native Tanzanian Cohort: MOYO Study.Global heart · 2024Article
- Article
- Cardiac ultrasound in resource-limited settings (CURLS): towards a wider use of basic echo applications in Africa.The ultrasound journal · 2019Article
- Reduction in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction is Associated with Subsequent Cardiac Events in Outpatients with Chronic Heart Failure.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- The Swedish Heart Failure Registry: a living, ongoing quality assurance and research in heart failure.Upsala journal of medical sciences · 2019Review
- Heart Failure in Sub-Saharan Africa.Cardiac failure review · 2018Review
- Heart failure, post-hospital mortality and renal function in Tanzania: A prospective cohort study.International journal of cardiology · 2017Article
- Strengthening medical education in haematology and blood transfusion: postgraduate programmes in Tanzania.British journal of haematology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHeart failure (HF) in developing countries is poorly described. We compare characteristics and prognosis of HF in Tanzania vs. Sweden.
methodsA prospective cohort study was conducted from the Tanzania HF study (TaHeF) and the Swedish HF Registry (SwedeHF). Patients were compared overall (n 427 vs. 51,060) and after matching 1:3 by gender and age±5years (n 411 vs. 1232). The association between cohort and all-cause mortality was assessed with multivariable Cox regression.
resultsIn the unmatched cohorts, TaHeF (as compared to SwedeHF) patients were younger (median age [interquartile range] 55 [40-68] vs. 77 [64-84] years, p<0.001) and more commonly women (51% vs. 40%, p<0.001). The three-year survival was 61% in both cohorts. In the matched cohorts, TaHeF patients had more hypertension (47% vs. 37%, p<0.001), more anemia (57% vs. 9%), more preserved EF, more advanced HF, longer duration of HF, and less use of beta-blockers. Crude mortality was worse in TaHeF (HR 2.25 [95% CI 1.78-2.85], p<0.001), with three-year survival 61% vs. 83%. However, covariate-adjusted risk was similar (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.69-1.66; p=0.760). In both cohorts, preserved EF was associated with higher mortality in crude but not adjusted analysis.
conclusionsCompared to in Sweden, HF patients in Tanzania were younger and more commonly female, and after age and gender matching, had more frequent hypertension and anemia, more severe HF despite higher EF, and worse crude but similar adjusted prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.