ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2016
Safe and easy access technique for the first trocar in laparoscopic surgery.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Laparoscopy in Blunt Abdominal Trauma: for Whom? When?and Why?Current trauma reports · 2017Review
- Fast, Easy, and Safe Establishment of Pneumoperitoneum in Laparoscopic Surgery: The Fingertip Technique.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
- E-Z Point: A New Safe and Reproducible Laparoscopic Entry in the Left Upper Quadrant Using a Veress Needle.Journal of human reproductive sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccess-related injuries are still an important consideration and may increase morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to present in detail a safe and easy technique for open insertion of the first trocar. PATIENTS AND
methodsThis technique has been used routinely in the vast majority of laparoscopic procedures at first author's department since 1998. The data were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively for the 11-year period of January 2005 through December 2015. The primary site of access is the umbilicus, but this technique can be used for all insertion points.
resultsA total of 2579 laparoscopic surgical interventions were performed. The abdominal access was established in 2252 patients in open and in 321 cases with blind puncture using a Veress needle. There were three cases (0.9 %) of accidental injuries with blind puncture and two cases (0.09 %) with open technique. Injuries sustained with open technique injuries were less severe and immediately discernable. None of the patients were converted to open technique.
conclusionThe method can be used easily and rapidly, even in obese patients. It is safer than blind puncture and reduces costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27393686What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.