Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27393572›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2016

Posttreatment Surveillance in Patients with Prolonged Disease-Free Survival After Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastasis.

Boris Galjart, Eric P van der Stok, Joost Rothbarth, Dirk J Grünhagen, Cornelis Verhoef

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Circulating Tumor DNA Dynamics in Patients with Liver-Limited Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Resected after First-Line Systemic Treatment.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Boris GaljartDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. b.galjart@erasmusmc.nl.
Eric P van der StokDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Joost RothbarthDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Dirk J GrünhagenDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Cornelis VerhoefDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPosttreatment surveillance protocols most often endure for 5 years after resection of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). Most recurrences happen within 3 years after surgical removal of the tumour. This study analysed the need of surveillance for patients with at least 3 years of disease-free survival after potentially curative resection of CRLM.

methodsA single-centre, retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients who underwent treatment for CRLM with curative intent between 2000 and 2011.

resultsIn total, 152 of 545 patients (28 %) remained disease-free for 3 years after successful resection of the CRLM. The estimated recurrence rate after 10 years of follow-up in this group of 152 patients was 27 %. More than half of these patients (55 %) could be treated with curative intent for their recurrences. Multivariable analysis revealed that the nodal status of the primary tumour is of significant prognostic value for developing recurrences after 3 years of disease-free survival. A disease-free interval of less than 12 months between resection of primary tumour and detection of CRLM shows a trend towards significance. Both factors were used to create a risk score, showing that patients with a low-risk profile (node-negative status and a disease-free interval <12 months) have an estimated recurrence rate of 5 % and might not benefit from intensive surveillance beyond 3 years of follow-up without a recurrence.

conclusionsThe currently developed risk score shows that follow-up can be stopped in a specific subgroup 3 years after treatment for their CRLM with curative intent.

Indexed as

Population SurveillanceWatchful WaitingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overColorectal NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHepatectomyHumansLiver NeoplasmsLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID27393572
PMCPMC5047936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.