Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27393530›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease2016

Connectivity of diagnostic technologies: improving surveillance and accelerating tuberculosis elimination.

E Andre, C Isaacs, D Affolabi, R Alagna, D Brockmann, B C de Jong, E Cambau, G Churchyard, T Cohen, M Delmee and 18 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Diagnosing Tuberculosis: What Do New Technologies Allow Us to (Not) Do?Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

E AndrePôle de Microbiologie Médicale, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Service de Microbiologie, Département de Biologie Clinique, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium; European Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) Study Group for Mycobacterial Infections (ESGMYC), ESCMID, Basel, Switzerland.
C IsaacsFoundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Geneva, Switzerland.
D AffolabiFaculty of Health Sciences, Abomey-Calavi University, Cotonou, National Tuberculosis Programme, Cotonou, Benin.
R AlagnaTB Supranational Reference Laboratory, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
D BrockmannInstitute for Theoretical Biology, Department of Biology, Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Epidemiological Modelling of Infectious Diseases, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
B C de JongUnit of Mycobacteriology, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgium.
E CambauEuropean Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) Study Group for Mycobacterial Infections (ESGMYC), ESCMID, Basel, Switzerland; Université Paris Diderot, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité mixte de recherche 1137, Infection, Antimicrobiens, Modélisation, Evolution, Paris, Bactériologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France.
G ChurchyardAurum Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa.
T CohenYale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
M DelmeePôle de Microbiologie Médicale, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Service de Microbiologie, Département de Biologie Clinique, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
J-C DelvenneInstitute of Information and Communication Technologies, Electronics and Applied Mathematics, Centre for Operations Research and Econometrics, Université Catholique de Louvain, Belgium.
M FarhatMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
A HabibInteractive Health Solutions, Karachi, Pakistan.
P HolmeSungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea.
S KeshavjeeHarvard Medical School Center for Global Health Delivery, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
A KhanInteractive Research and Development, Karachi, Pakistan.
P LightfootFoundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Geneva, Switzerland.
D MooreTB Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Y MorenoInstitute for Biocomputation and Physics of Complex Systems (BIFI), Department of Theoretical Physics, Faculty of Sciences, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Y MundadeUNITAID, Geneva, Switzerland.
M PaiMcGill International TB Centre & McGill Global Health Programs, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
S PatelUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
A U NyaruhiriraManagement Sciences for Health, Gauteng, South Africa.
L E C RochaKarolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, Université de Namur, Namur, Belgium.
J TakleGlobal Connectivity LLC, Somerville, Massachusetts, USA.
A TrébucqInternational Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, France.
J CreswellStop TB Partnership, Geneva, Switzerland.
C BoehmeFoundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In regard to tuberculosis (TB) and other major global epidemics, the use of new diagnostic tests is increasing dramatically, including in resource-limited countries. Although there has never been as much digital information generated, this data source has not been exploited to its full potential. In this opinion paper, we discuss lessons learned from the global scale-up of these laboratory devices and the pathway to tapping the potential of laboratory-generated information in the field of TB by using connectivity. Responding to the demand for connectivity, innovative third-party players have proposed solutions that have been widely adopted by field users of the Xpert(®) MTB/RIF assay. The experience associated with the utilisation of these systems, which facilitate the monitoring of wide laboratory networks, stressed the need for a more global and comprehensive approach to diagnostic connectivity. In addition to facilitating the reporting of test results, the mobility of digital information allows the sharing of information generated in programme settings. When they become easily accessible, these data can be used to improve patient care, disease surveillance and drug discovery. They should therefore be considered as a public health good. We list several examples of concrete initiatives that should allow data sources to be combined to improve the understanding of the epidemic, support the operational response and, finally, accelerate TB elimination. With the many opportunities that the pooling of data associated with the TB epidemic can provide, pooling of this information at an international level has become an absolute priority.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Tests, RoutineElectronic Health RecordsMedical Record LinkageMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesReagent Kits, DiagnosticAccess to InformationEpidemicsForecastingHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisTime FactorsTuberculosisReagent Kits, Diagnostic

Identifiers

PMID27393530
PMCPMC4937753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.