Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27393498›Full record

Observational studyArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2016

Effects of a novel foot-ankle orthosis in the non-operative treatment of unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis.

Björn Menger, Andreas Kannenberg, Wolf Petersen, Thore Zantop, Ingo Rembitzki, Hartmut Stinus

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Knee adduction moment decomposition: Toward better clinical decision-making.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Björn MengerDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Andreas KannenbergOtto Bock Health Care, Duderstadt, Germany.
Wolf PetersenKlinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Martin Luther Krankenhaus, Berlin, Germany. wolf.petersen@pgdiakonie.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6834-4438
Thore ZantopSporthopaedicum Straubing, Straubing, Germany.
Ingo RembitzkiDeutsche Sporthochschule Köln, Cologne, Germany.
Hartmut StinusOrthopaedicum Northeim, Northeim, Germany.
Bausch Health (Germany) · DEGerman Sport University Cologne · DEMartin-Luther-Krankenhaus · DEUniversity of Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUnloader braces are non-surgical treatment options for patients with unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis (OA). However, many patients do not adhere to brace treatment because of complications related to discomfort and poor fit. An alternative to knee bracing is an ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) with a lever arm that presses the lower leg into valgus or varus. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical benefits of this AFO for patients with unicompartmental knee OA. MATERIALS AND

methodsTwenty-three patients with knee OA were enrolled in this observational study. The primary clinical outcome measure was the Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) total score. Secondary outcome measures included WOMAC subscores, visual analogue pain scale, activity restriction and complication rate. Clinical scores were collected at start and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after enrollment. Statistical evaluation was performed using the Student's t test.

resultsOf the patients enrolled, 83 % suffered from medial compartment OA. Most patients had Grade II OA according to the Kellgren and Lawrence classification. WOMAC total score, both subscores and visual analogue pain scale were significantly improved over time. Patients also noted a reduction in restrictions to activities of daily living and sport-related activities while using the AFO. No patients discontinued orthosis use because of adverse effects. Two types of complications were noted: discomfort or light pressure sores around the ankle (7 patients), and wear and tear of the shoe in which the AFO was worn (14 patients).

conclusionsThis observational study suggests that this AFO is effective at significantly reducing pain and stiffness as well as improving the physical function of patients with mild to moderate unicompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee.

Indexed as

Foot OrthosesActivities of Daily LivingCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneePain MeasurementKnee adduction momentMalalignmentNon-operative treatmentOsteoarthritisUnloader braceVarus knee

Identifiers

PMID27393498
PMCPMC4990629
OpenAlexW2472877170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.