Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27393347›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2016

Integrative analysis of diffusion-weighted MRI and genomic data to inform treatment of glioblastoma.

Guido H Jajamovich, Chandni R Valiathan, Razvan Cristescu, Sangeetha Somayajula

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Radiomic biomarkers of tumor immune biology and immunotherapy response.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2021
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Guido H JajamovichScientific Informatics, Merck Research Laboratories, 470 Atlantic Avenue, Suite 305, Boston, MA, 02210, USA. guido.jajamovich@merck.com.
Chandni R ValiathanScientific Informatics, Merck Research Laboratories, 470 Atlantic Avenue, Suite 305, Boston, MA, 02210, USA.
Razvan CristescuDepartment of Genetics and Pharmacogenomics, Merck Research Laboratories, 33 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Sangeetha SomayajulaScientific Informatics, Merck Research Laboratories, 470 Atlantic Avenue, Suite 305, Boston, MA, 02210, USA.
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene expression profiling from glioblastoma (GBM) patients enables characterization of cancer into subtypes that can be predictive of response to therapy. An integrative analysis of imaging and gene expression data can potentially be used to obtain novel biomarkers that are closely associated with the genetic subtype and gene signatures and thus provide a noninvasive approach to stratify GBM patients. In this retrospective study, we analyzed the expression of 12,042 genes for 558 patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Among these patients, 50 patients had magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies including diffusion weighted (DW) MRI in The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA). We identified the contrast enhancing region of the tumors using the pre- and post-contrast T1-weighted MRI images and computed the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histograms from the DW-MRI images. Using the gene expression data, we classified patients into four molecular subtypes, determined the number and composition of genes modules using the gap statistic, and computed gene signature scores. We used logistic regression to find significant predictors of GBM subtypes. We compared the predictors for different subtypes using Mann-Whitney U tests. We assessed detection power using area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. We computed Spearman correlations to determine the associations between ADC and each of the gene signatures. We performed gene enrichment analysis using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA). We adjusted all p values using the Benjamini and Hochberg method. The mean ADC was a significant predictor for the neural subtype. Neural tumors had a significantly lower mean ADC compared to non-neural tumors ([Formula: see text]), with mean ADC of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] for neural and non-neural tumors, respectively. Mean ADC showed an area under the ROC of 0.75 for detecting neural tumors. We found eight gene modules in the GBM cohort. The mean ADC was significantly correlated with the gene signature related with dendritic cell maturation ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]). Mean ADC could be used as a biomarker of a gene signature associated with dendritic cell maturation and to assist in identifying patients with neural GBMs, known to be resistant to aggressive standard of care.

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingGenomicsAdultAgedBrain NeoplasmsContrast MediaCytokinesFemaleGene ExpressionGene Expression ProfilingGenomeGlioblastomaHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleContrast MediaCytokinesApparent diffusion coefficientGlioblastoma multiformeImaging genomicsImmunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID27393347
OpenAlexW2473123412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.