Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27393321›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of occupational and environmental medicine2016

Respiratory Morbidity among Indian Tea Industry Workers.

S Moitra, P Thapa, P Das, J Das, S Debnath, Mahipal Singh, A Datta, S Sen, S Moitra

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of occupational and environmental medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Statistical Data Editing in Scientific Articles.Journal of Korean medical science · 2017
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S MoitraDepartment of Pneumology, Allergy and Asthma Research Centre, Kolkata, India. saibal.moitra@gmail.com.
P Thapa
P Das
J Das
S Debnath
Mahipal Singh
A Datta
S Sen
S Moitra
Asthma Association · BG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndian tea industry workers are exposed to various exposures at their workplace.

objectiveTo investigate the respiratory health of Indian tea industry workers.

methodsWe administered a respiratory questionnaire to and measured lung function in workers of 34 tea gardens and 46 tea factories. We used correlation matrices to test the association between their respiratory symptoms and lung functions.

resultsThe garden workers complained of shortness of breath 3 times higher than the factory workers. However, nasal allergy was more predominant among the factory workers compared to garden workers (69.6% vs 41.2%, p=0.02). The factory workers had higher total (median 107.3% vs 92.9%, p=0.05, as measured by R at 5 Hz) and peripheral airway resistance (143.8% vs 61.1%, p=0.005, as measured by R at 5-20 Hz) than the garden workers. Respiratory symptoms were inversely associated with airway obstruction as measured by the ratio between forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) and positively correlated with increased overall airway reactance among the workers.

conclusionRespiratory symptoms and increased allergen susceptibility of Indian tea industry workers due to occupational exposures warrant routine systematic surveillance of their workplace air quality and health monitoring.

Indexed as

AdultAir Pollution, IndoorAirway ObstructionAirway ResistanceDyspneaFemaleForced Expiratory VolumeHumansIndiaIndustryMaleManufacturing and Industrial FacilitiesMiddle AgedOccupational ExposureSurveys and QuestionnairesTeaTea

Identifiers

PMID27393321
PMCPMC6818078
OpenAlexW2470530939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.