ArticleDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2016
[Transparent operative training in visceral surgery : Analysis at a German university medical center].
Article in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Fridays for future! - All days for surgery! : Thoughts of young surgeons on a modern promotion of the next generation].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2022Review
- See (n)One, Do (n)One, Teach (n)One: Reality of Surgical Resident Training in Germany.World journal of surgery · 2020Article
- Evidence in surgical training - a review.Innovative surgical sciences · 2019Review
- [Work-life balance : Thoughts of the Young Surgeon representatives of the German Surgical Society].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2018Review
- [Work and training conditions of residents in urology in Germany : Results of a 2015 nationwide survey by the German Society of Residents in Urology].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPractical operative training in the discipline of visceral surgery is currently under discussion. Aside from surveys, data on this topic in Germany are sparse. The aim of the study was an objective collation of surgical residents' practical training in the operating room in our department.
methodsAll surgical cases from 2015 were prospectively included. Procedures were stratified into resident and non-resident operations and complex cases with sub-steps which could potentially be performed by residents. We analyzed whether an operation or surgical sub-steps were performed by a resident. If this was not achieved, the reasons were analyzed. An anonymous online survey was conducted among employees in the surgery department regarding surgical training.
resultsOut of 2896 surgical cases 1141 (39.4 %) were classified as potential resident training operations, which were actually performed by a resident in 743 cases (65.1 %). The survey showed an underestimation of this proportion, where sub-steps were assisted in 30.3 % (n = 265) of 876 potential cases. This proportion significantly increased during the observation period (p < 0.001); however, it was highly overestimated by residents as well as fellows and senior consultants. Often organizational reasons were responsible when resident operations or sub-steps were not performed by a trainee (13.1 % and 30.0 %, respectively).
conclusionThe monocentric analysis per se resulted in an improvement in practical surgical training. In the training environment, assisting with sub-steps provides a great potential. Multicenter studies are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27392762What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.