Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27392762›Full record

ArticleDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2016

[Transparent operative training in visceral surgery : Analysis at a German university medical center].

W Kneist, T Huber, M Paschold, F Bartsch, M Herzer, H Lang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Evidence in surgical training - a review.Innovative surgical sciences · 2019
    Review
  4. [Work-life balance : Thoughts of the Young Surgeon representatives of the German Surgical Society].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2018
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

W KneistKlinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland. werner.kneist@unimedizin-mainz.de.
T HuberKlinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland.
M PascholdKlinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland.
F BartschKlinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland.
M HerzerZentrum für Qualitätssicherung und -entwicklung (ZQ), Hochschulevaluierungsverbund Süd-West e. V., Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Deutschland.
H LangKlinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPractical operative training in the discipline of visceral surgery is currently under discussion. Aside from surveys, data on this topic in Germany are sparse. The aim of the study was an objective collation of surgical residents' practical training in the operating room in our department.

methodsAll surgical cases from 2015 were prospectively included. Procedures were stratified into resident and non-resident operations and complex cases with sub-steps which could potentially be performed by residents. We analyzed whether an operation or surgical sub-steps were performed by a resident. If this was not achieved, the reasons were analyzed. An anonymous online survey was conducted among employees in the surgery department regarding surgical training.

resultsOut of 2896 surgical cases 1141 (39.4 %) were classified as potential resident training operations, which were actually performed by a resident in 743 cases (65.1 %). The survey showed an underestimation of this proportion, where sub-steps were assisted in 30.3 % (n = 265) of 876 potential cases. This proportion significantly increased during the observation period (p < 0.001); however, it was highly overestimated by residents as well as fellows and senior consultants. Often organizational reasons were responsible when resident operations or sub-steps were not performed by a trainee (13.1 % and 30.0 %, respectively).

conclusionThe monocentric analysis per se resulted in an improvement in practical surgical training. In the training environment, assisting with sub-steps provides a great potential. Multicenter studies are needed.

Indexed as

Academic Medical CentersCurriculumDigestive System Surgical ProceduresEducation, Medical, GraduateFaculty, MedicalGermanyHumansInternship and ResidencyPhysician AssistantsProspective StudiesVisceraCareer choiceHuman resources managementPostgraduate educationSurgical educationVisceral surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.