Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27392615›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2016

Malignant lipogenesis defined by

Naresh Regula, Michael Häggman, Silvia Johansson, Jens Sörensen

Abstract readControlled Clinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Comparison ofScientific reports · 2020
    Article
  6. Carbon Flux as a Measure of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness: [International journal of medical sciences · 2020
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Molecular imaging of prostate cancer.The British journal of radiology · 2018
    Review
  9. Article
  10. The value of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Naresh RegulaSection of Nuclear Medicine and PET, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Michael HäggmanSection of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Silvia JohanssonSection of Oncology, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Jens SörensenSection of Nuclear Medicine and PET, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. jens.sorensen@pet.uu.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMalignant de novo lipogenesis is strongly linked to the aggressiveness of prostate cancer (PCa) under experimental conditions.

methodsAll patients undergoing

resultsA total of 121 patients were included, and 22 PCa-specific deaths were recorded. The mean PSA level at the time of PET was 2.69 ± 4.35 ng/mL. The median follow-up of the study population was 79 ± 28 months. PET identified at least one PCa lesion in 53 % of patients. Five-year PCa-specific survival after PET was 80 % and 100 % in patients with a positive and a negative PET scan, respectively (p < 0.001). Time-to-death was linearly correlated with highest SUV

conclusionMalignant

Indexed as

AcetatesCarbonLipogenesisAgedHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyPrevalenceProstatectomyProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsRadiopharmaceuticalsReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentSensitivity and SpecificityAcetatesCarboncarbon-11 acetateProstate-Specific AntigenRadiopharmaceuticals11C-AcetateFatty acid synthaseMalignant lipogenesisPositron emission tomographyProstate carcinomaSurvival analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.