ReviewDer Unfallchirurg2016
[Evidence-based trauma and orthopedic surgery : 20 years after Sackett].
Review in Der Unfallchirurg, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The effects of platelet-rich plasma combined with a skin flap transplant on open foot fractures with soft tissue defects.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The article "Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't" published in the BMJ in 1996, is regarded as the foundation of the evidence-based medicine (EbM) movement. Approximately 5 years later David L. Sackett, one of the leaders of the movement, requested all experts to voluntarily abandon their position to make way for young researchers and fresh ideas. Since the term was first coined and the establishment of organizations and platforms fostering the idea, EbM has polarized clinicians and scientists around the world. Clinical and methodological developments during recent years have, however, overtaken the original principles of EbM. This review highlights the core concepts of EbM which have remained unchanged and valid for the current practice of trauma and orthopedic surgery and where revision is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27392450What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.