Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27392074›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2016

The Relationship between Common Genetic Markers of Breast Cancer Risk and Chemotherapy-Induced Toxicity: A Case-Control Study.

Leila Dorling, Siddhartha Kar, Kyriaki Michailidou, Louise Hiller, Anne-Laure Vallier, Susan Ingle, Richard Hardy, Sarah J Bowden, Janet A Dunn, Chris Twelves and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The Variant at TGFBRAP1 but Not TGFBR2 Is Associated with Antituberculosis Drug-Induced Liver Injury.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Leila DorlingCentre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1214-8080
Siddhartha KarCentre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Kyriaki MichailidouCentre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Louise HillerWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Anne-Laure VallierCambridge Breast Unit and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge NHS Foundation Hospitals, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Susan IngleCambridge Breast Unit and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge NHS Foundation Hospitals, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Richard HardyCambridge Breast Unit and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge NHS Foundation Hospitals, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Sarah J BowdenCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Janet A DunnWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Chris TwelvesLeeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology and Leeds Experimental Cancer Medical Centre, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Christopher J PooleWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Carlos CaldasCambridge Breast Unit and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge NHS Foundation Hospitals, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Helena M EarlCambridge Breast Unit and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge NHS Foundation Hospitals, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Paul D P PharoahCentre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Jean E AbrahamCentre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
University of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Warwick · GBCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 10119Cancer Research UK 10124Cancer Research UK 16465Cancer Research UK 16561Cancer Research UK 16942Cancer Research UK 9675Medical Research Council MR/M008975/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ninety-four common genetic variants are confirmed to be associated with breast cancer. This study tested the hypothesis that breast cancer susceptibility variants may also be associated with chemotherapy-induced toxicity through shared mechanistic pathways such as DNA damage response, an association that, to our knowledge, has not been previously investigated. The study included breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy from the Pharmacogenetic SNPs (PGSNPS) study. For each patient, a breast cancer polygenic risk score was created from the 94 breast cancer risk variants, all of which were genotyped or successfully imputed in PGSNPS. Logistic regression was performed to test the association with two clinically important toxicities: taxane- related neuropathy (n = 1279) and chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (n = 1676). This study was well powered (≥96%) to detect associations between polygenic risk score and chemotherapy toxicity. Patients with high breast cancer risk scores experienced less neutropenia compared to those with low risk scores (adjusted p-value = 0.06). Exploratory functional pathway analysis was performed and no functional pathways driving this trend were identified. Polygenic risk was not associated with taxane neuropathy (adjusted p-value = 0.48). These results suggest that breast cancer patients with high genetic risk of breast cancer, conferred by common variants, can safely receive standard chemotherapy without increased risk of taxane-related sensory neuropathy or chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and may experience less neutropenia. As neutropenia has previously been associated with improved survival and may reflect drug efficacy, these patients may be less likely to benefit from standard chemotherapy treatment.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsNeutropeniaPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPharmacogenomic TestingRisk FactorsSurvival RateBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID27392074
PMCPMC4938564
OpenAlexW2461966719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.