Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27392037›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2016

Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus in livestock ticks and animal handler seroprevalence at an abattoir in Ghana.

R Akuffo, J A M Brandful, A Zayed, A Adjei, N Watany, N T Fahmy, R Hughes, B Doman, S V Voegborlo, D Aziati and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

R AkuffoU.S Naval Medical Research Unit No. 3, Cairo, Egypt. Richard.akuffo@gmail.com.
J A M BrandfulNoguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
A ZayedU.S Naval Medical Research Unit No. 3, Cairo, Egypt.
A AdjeiUniversity of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
N WatanyU.S Naval Medical Research Unit No. 3, Cairo, Egypt.
N T FahmyU.S Naval Medical Research Unit No. 3, Cairo, Egypt.
R HughesU.S Naval Medical Research Unit No. 3, Cairo, Egypt.
B DomanU.S Naval Medical Research Unit No. 3, Cairo, Egypt.
S V VoegborloU.S Naval Medical Research Unit No. 3, Cairo, Egypt.
D AziatiNoguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
D PrattNoguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
J A AwuniVeterinary Services of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
N AdamsU.S Naval Medical Research Unit No. 3, Cairo, Egypt.
E DuegerU.S Naval Medical Research Unit No. 3, Cairo, Egypt.
United States Naval Medical Research Unit III · EGUniversity of Ghana · GHCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USMinistry of Food and Agriculture · GH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCrimean-Congo Haemorrhagic Fever Virus (CCHFV) is a zoonotic virus transmitted by Ixodid ticks and causes Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF) disease in humans with up to 50 % mortality rate.

methodsFreshly slaughtered livestock at the Kumasi abattoir in the Ashanti Region of Ghana were examined for the presence of ticks once a month over a 6-month period from May to November 2011. The ticks were grouped into pools by species, sex, and animal source. CCHFV was detected in the ticks using reverse transcription PCR. Blood samples were collected from enrolled abattoir workers at initiation, and from those who reported fever in a preceding 30-day period during monthly visits 2-5 months after initiation. Six months after initiation, all participants who provided baseline samples were invited to provide blood samples. Serology was performed using enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Demographic and epidemiological data was also obtained from enrolled participants using a structured questionnaire.

resultsOf 428 freshly slaughtered animals comprising 130 sheep, 149 cattle, and 149 goats examined, 144 ticks belonging to the genera Ambylomma, Hyalomma and Boophilus were identified from 57 (13.3 %): 52 (34.9 %), 4 (3.1 %) and 1 (0.7 %) cattle, sheep and goat respectively. Of 97 tick pools tested, 5 pools comprising 1 pool of Hyalomma excavatum and 4 pools of Ambylomma variegatum, collected from cattle, were positive for CCHFV. Of 188 human serum samples collected from 108 abattoir workers, 7 (3.7 %) samples from 6 persons were anti-CCHF IgG positive with one of them also being CCHF IgM positive. The seroprevalence of CCHFV identified in this study was 5.7 %.

conclusionsThis study detected human exposure to CCHF virus in slaughterhouse workers and also identified the CCHF virus in proven vectors (ticks) of Crimean Congo hemorrhagic fever in Ghana. The CCHFV was detected only in ticks collected from cattle, one of the livestock known to play a role in the amplification of the CCHF virus.

Indexed as

AbattoirsAdultAgricultural Workers' DiseasesAnimalsAntibodies, Anti-IdiotypicCattleEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleGhanaGoatsHemorrhagic Fever, CrimeanHemorrhagic Fever Virus, Crimean-CongoHumansLivestockMaleMiddle AgedAntibodies, Anti-Idiotypicanti-IgGAbattoirAmbylommaBoophilusCrimean-congo hemorrhagic feverCrimean-congo hemorrhagic fever virusGhanaHyalommaLivestockSeroprevalenceTicks

Identifiers

PMID27392037
PMCPMC4939019
OpenAlexW2463166584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.