Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27391345›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2016

Increasing sensitivity to DNA damage is a potential driver for human ovarian cancer.

Yimei Jin, Xin Xu, Xuemeng Wang, Henry Kuang, Michael Osterman, Shi Feng, Deqiang Han, Yu Wu, Mo Li, Hongyan Guo

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Yimei JinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, P.R. China.
Xin XuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, P.R. China.
Xuemeng WangDepartment of Molecular and Medical pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, 90095, USA.
Henry KuangMedical School and University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, USA.
Michael OstermanSchool of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, USA.
Shi FengEducation Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, P.R. China.
Deqiang HanDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, State Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Biology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100005, China.
Yu WuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, P.R. China.
Mo LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, P.R. China.
Hongyan GuoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, P.R. China.
Peking University · CNPeking University Third Hospital · CNUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ovarian cancer is one of the most common cancers among women, accounting for more deaths than any other gynecological diseases. However, the survival rate for ovarian cancer has not essentially improved over the past thirty years. Thus, to understand the molecular mechanism of ovarian tumorigenesis is important for optimizing the early diagnosis and treating this disease. In this study, we observed obvious DNA lesions, especially DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) accompanying cell cycle checkpoint activation, in the human epithelial ovarian cancer samples, which could be due to the impaired DNA response machinery. Following this line, we found that these DNA damage response-deficient primary cancer cells were hypersensitive to DNA damage and lost their ability to repair the DNA breaks, leading to genomic instability. Of note, three key DNA damage response factors, RNF8, Ku70, and FEN1 exhibited dramatically decreased expression level, implying the dysfunctional DNA repair pathways. Re-expression of wild type RNF8, Ku70, or FEN1 in these cells restored the DNA lesions and also partially rescued the cells from death. Our current study therefore proposes that accumulated DNA lesions might be a potential driver of ovarian cancer and the impaired DNA damage responders could be the targets for clinical treatment.

Indexed as

DNA DamageAdultBiomarkers, TumorCell CycleComet AssayDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA RepairFemaleFlap EndonucleasesGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansKu AutoantigenMiddle AgedOvarian NeoplasmsUbiquitin-Protein LigasesBiomarkers, TumorDNA-Binding ProteinsFEN1 protein, humanFlap EndonucleasesKu AutoantigenRNF8 protein, humanUbiquitin-Protein LigasesDNA damageDNA repairgenomic instabilityovarian cancer

Identifiers

PMID27391345
PMCPMC5226541
OpenAlexW2468273462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.