Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27391309›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2016

Comparison of weekly administration of cisplatin versus three courses of cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) for definitive radiochemotherapy of locally advanced head-and-neck cancers.

Dirk Rades, Daniel Seidl, Stefan Janssen, Amira Bajrovic, Katarina Karner, Primoz Strojan, Steven E Schild

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Comparison of the Effect of Weekly Cisplatin Versus Three Weekly Cisplatin in Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy of Head and Neck Cancer: A Pilot Study.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Prospective Randomised Comparative Study Between Weekly Cisplatin Versus Three Weekly Cisplatin with Radiotherapy in Unresectable Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Weekly versus every-three-weeks platinum-based chemoradiation regimens for head and neck cancer.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale · 2016
    Article
  13. CisplatinIn vivo (Athens, Greece)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dirk RadesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Lubeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538, Lübeck, Germany. Rades.Dirk@gmx.net.
Daniel SeidlDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Lubeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538, Lübeck, Germany.
Stefan JanssenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Lubeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538, Lübeck, Germany.
Amira BajrovicDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Katarina KarnerDepartment of Radiotherapy, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Primoz StrojanDepartment of Radiotherapy, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Steven E SchildDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo compare definitive radiochemotherapy with weekly administration of 30-40 mg/m(2) of cisplatin to 100 mg/m(2) of cisplatin on days 1, 22 and 43 for outcomes and toxicity in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head-and-neck.

methodsSeventy-five patients receiving radiochemotherapy with weekly cisplatin (30-40 mg/m(2)) were compared to 58 patients receiving radiochemotherapy with 100 mg/m(2) cisplatin on days 1, 22 and 43. Radiochemotherapy regimen plus seven characteristics (age, gender, performance score, tumor site, T-/N-category, histologic grading) were evaluated for locoregional control (LRC), metastases-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS). Radiochemotherapy groups were compared for toxicity.

resultsOn multivariate analysis, improved LRC was associated with cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) (hazard ratio [HR] 1.57; p = 0.008) and female gender (HR 4.37; p = 0.003). Radiochemotherapy regimen was not significantly associated with MFS on univariate analysis (p = 0.66). On multivariate analysis, better MFS was associated with ECOG performance score 0-1 (HR 5.63; p < 0.001) and histological grade 1-2 (HR 1.81; p = 0.002). On multivariate analysis, improved OS was associated with cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) (HR 1.33; p = 0.023), ECOG performance score 0-1 (HR 2.15; p = 0.029) and female gender (HR 1.98; p = 0.026). Cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) was associated with higher rates of grade ≥3 hematotoxicity (p = 0.004), grade ≥2 renal failure (p = 0.004) and pneumonia/sepsis (p = 0.033).

conclusionsRadiochemotherapy with 100 mg/m(2) of cisplatin every 3 weeks resulted in better LRC and OS than weekly doses of 30-40 mg/m(2). Given the limitations of a retrospective study, 100 mg/m(2) of cisplatin appears preferable. Since this regimen was associated with considerable acute toxicity, patients require close monitoring.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Squamous CellChemoradiotherapyCisplatinDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisProportional Hazards ModelsAntineoplastic AgentsCisplatinAdverse eventsCisplatinDefinitive treatmentHead-and-neck cancerOutcomesRadiochemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID27391309
PMCPMC4938984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.