Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27391306›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

New Primers for Discovering Fungal Diversity Using Nuclear Large Ribosomal DNA.

Asma Asemaninejad, Nimalka Weerasuriya, Gregory B Gloor, Zoë Lindo, R Greg Thorn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Elevated abundance ofCurrent research in food science · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Mushroom DNA barcoding project: Sequencing a segment of the 28S rRNA gene.Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Emerging Insights into the Occupational Mycobiome.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2018
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Asma AsemaninejadThe University of Western Ontario, Department of Biology, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5B7.
Nimalka WeerasuriyaThe University of Western Ontario, Department of Biology, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5B7.
Gregory B GloorThe University of Western Ontario, Department of Biochemistry, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5B7.
Zoë LindoThe University of Western Ontario, Department of Biology, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5B7.
R Greg ThornThe University of Western Ontario, Department of Biology, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5B7.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7199-6226

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metabarcoding has become an important tool in the discovery of biodiversity, including fungi, which are the second most speciose group of eukaryotes, with diverse and important ecological roles in terrestrial ecosystems. We have designed and tested new PCR primers that target the D1 variable region of nuclear large subunit (LSU) ribosomal DNA; one set that targets the phylum Ascomycota and another that recovers all other fungal phyla. The primers yield amplicons compatible with the Illumina MiSeq platform, which is cost-effective and has a lower error rate than other high throughput sequencing platforms. The new primer set LSU200A-F/LSU476A-R (Ascomycota) yielded 95-98% of reads of target taxa from environmental samples, and primers LSU200-F/LSU481-R (all other fungi) yielded 72-80% of target reads. Both primer sets have fairly low rates of data loss, and together they cover a wide variety of fungal taxa. We compared our results with these primers by amplifying and sequencing a subset of samples using the previously described ITS3_KYO2/ITS4_KYO3 primers, which amplify the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) of Ascomycota and Basidiomycota. With approximately equivalent read depth, our LSU primers recovered a greater number and phylogenetic diversity of sequences than the ITS2 primers. For instance, ITS3_KYO2/ITS4_KYO3 primers failed to pick up any members of Eurotiales, Mytilinidiales, Pezizales, Saccharomycetales, or Venturiales within Ascomycota, or members of Exobasidiomycetes, Microbotryomycetes, Pucciniomycetes, or Tremellomycetes within Basidiomycota, which were retrieved in good numbers from the same samples by our LSU primers. Among the OTUs recovered using the LSU primers were 127 genera and 28 species that were not obtained using the ITS2 primers, although the ITS2 primers recovered 10 unique genera and 16 species that were not obtained using either of the LSU primers These features identify the new primer sets developed in this study as useful complements to other universal primers for the study of fungal diversity and community composition.

Indexed as

AscomycotaBasidiomycotaDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicDNA, FungalDNA PrimersDNA, Ribosomal SpacerPolymerase Chain ReactionRibosome Subunits, Large, EukaryoticSpecies SpecificityDNA, FungalDNA PrimersDNA, Ribosomal Spacer

Identifiers

PMID27391306
PMCPMC4938210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.