Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27391112›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Acceptability of Salt Fluoridation in a Rural Latino Community in the United States: An Ethnographic Study.

Judith C Barker, Claudia Guerra, M Judy Gonzalez-Vargas, Kristin S Hoeft

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Fluoride Debate: The Pros and Cons of Fluoridation.Preventive nutrition and food science · 2018
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Judith C BarkerDepartment of Anthropology, History & Social Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
Claudia GuerraDepartment of Anthropology, History & Social Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
M Judy Gonzalez-VargasInstitute for Health Policy Studies, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
Kristin S HoeftDepartment of Anthropology, History & Social Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
University of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of San Francisco · US

Funding

Statistics and Data Coordinating CenterU54DE019285 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GANSKY, STUART A · 2008 to 2014
$24.9M
NIDCR NIH HHS U54 DE019285
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compared to other population groups in the United States, caries (tooth decay) is a disproportionately prevalent disease among Latino populations, especially among low-income and rural sub-groups and children under five years of age. Fluoride is a primary preventive for caries. While water fluoridation is a major and effective public health means for delivering fluoride on a mass scale, it does not reach many rural areas or population groups such as Latinos who eschew drinking water from municipal sources. This study examines the acceptability to such groups of salt fluoridation, an alternate means of delivering fluoride long used on a global scale. An ethnographic study in California's rural Central Valley was performed. Thirty individual interviews and 5 focus groups (N = 61) were conducted in Spanish to investigate low-income Latino migrant caregivers' experiences, views and understandings of domestic salt, oral health, caries prevention and fluoride. Audio data were transcribed, translated, coded and thematically analyzed. Table salt was readily available and frequently consumed. Both adult and child daily sodium consumption was high. Despite a general feeling that it was good, and present in dentifrices or dietary supplements, most participants had little knowledge about fluoride. Concerns were raised about cardio-vascular and other possibly deleterious effects if an increase in salt consumption occurred because fluoridated salt was viewed as having 'extra' benefits. Once informed about fluoride's safety and role in caries prevention, most participants expressed willingness to use fluoridated salt, especially if it benefitted children. Reassurance about its safety and benefits, and demonstration of its taste, were important aspects of acceptance. Taste was paramount. Participants would not consume more fluoridated salt than their current salt as that would result in unpleasant changes in food flavor and taste. While salt fluoridation is acceptable, the feasibility of producing and distributing fluoridated salt in the United States is, however, complex and challenging.

Indexed as

Anthropology, CulturalFluoridesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultFemaleFluoridationFluorosis, DentalHispanic or LatinoHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesFluorides

Identifiers

PMID27391112
PMCPMC4938551
OpenAlexW2461894085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.