Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27391083›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2016

Pain networks from the inside: Spatiotemporal analysis of brain responses leading from nociception to conscious perception.

Hélène Bastuji, Maud Frot, Caroline Perchet, Michel Magnin, Luis Garcia-Larrea

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hélène BastujiCentral Integration of Pain (NeuroPain) Lab - Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, INSERM U1028; CNRS, UMR5292, Université Claude Bernard, Bron, F-69677, France.
Maud FrotCentral Integration of Pain (NeuroPain) Lab - Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, INSERM U1028; CNRS, UMR5292, Université Claude Bernard, Bron, F-69677, France.
Caroline PerchetCentral Integration of Pain (NeuroPain) Lab - Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, INSERM U1028; CNRS, UMR5292, Université Claude Bernard, Bron, F-69677, France.
Michel MagninCentral Integration of Pain (NeuroPain) Lab - Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, INSERM U1028; CNRS, UMR5292, Université Claude Bernard, Bron, F-69677, France.
Luis Garcia-LarreaCentral Integration of Pain (NeuroPain) Lab - Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, INSERM U1028; CNRS, UMR5292, Université Claude Bernard, Bron, F-69677, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conscious perception of painful stimuli needs the contribution of an extensive cortico-subcortical network, and is completed in less than one second. While initial activities in operculo-insular and mid-cingulate cortices have been extensively assessed, the activation timing of most areas supporting conscious pain has barely been studied. Here we used intracranial EEG to investigate the dynamics of 16 brain regions (insular, parietal, prefrontal, cingulate, hippocampal and limbic) during the first second following nociceptive-specific laser pulses. Three waves of activation could be defined according to their temporal relation with conscious perception, ascertained by voluntary motor responses. Pre-conscious activities were recorded in the posterior insula, operculum, mid-cingulate and amygdala. Antero-insular, prefrontal and posterior parietal activities started later and developed during time-frames consistent with conscious voluntary reactions. Responses from hippocampus, perigenual and perisplenial cingulate developed latest and persisted well after conscious perception occurred. Nociceptive inputs reach simultaneously sensory and limbic networks, probably through parallel spino-thalamic and spino-parabrachial pathways, and the initial limbic activation precedes conscious perception of pain. Access of sensory information to consciousness develops concomitant to fronto-parietal activity, while late-occurring responses in the hippocampal region, perigenual and posterior cingulate cortices likely underlie processes linked to memory encoding, self-awareness and pain modulation. Hum Brain Mapp 37:4301-4315, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnticonvulsantsAwarenessBrainBrain MappingDrug Resistant EpilepsyElectrocorticographyEpilepsies, PartialEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMotor ActivityAnticonvulsantsconsciousnesshumanintracerebral EEGnociceptive stimuluspain matrix

Identifiers

PMID27391083
PMCPMC6867521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.