Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27391011›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2016

GUTSS: An Alignment-Free Sequence Comparison Method for Use in Human Intestinal Microbiome and Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Analysis.

Mitchell J Brittnacher, Sonya L Heltshe, Hillary S Hayden, Matthew C Radey, Eli J Weiss, Christopher J Damman, Timothy L Zisman, David L Suskind, Samuel I Miller

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mitchell J BrittnacherDepartment of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7554-5732
Sonya L HeltsheDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Hillary S HaydenDepartment of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Matthew C RadeyDepartment of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Eli J WeissDepartment of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Christopher J DammanDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Timothy L ZismanDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
David L SuskindDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Samuel I MillerDepartment of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
University of Washington · USSeattle Children's Hospital · US

Funding

Translational Research Center to Expedite Novel Therapies in Cystic FibrosisP30DK089507 · NIDDK · SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI Christopher Hooper Goss, Lucas R Hoffman · 2010 to 2026
$21.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK089507
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComparative analysis of gut microbiomes in clinical studies of human diseases typically rely on identification and quantification of species or genes. In addition to exploring specific functional characteristics of the microbiome and potential significance of species diversity or expansion, microbiome similarity is also calculated to study change in response to therapies directed at altering the microbiome. Established ecological measures of similarity can be constructed from species abundances, however methods for calculating these commonly used ecological measures of similarity directly from whole genome shotgun (WGS) metagenomic sequence are lacking.

resultsWe present an alignment-free method for calculating similarity of WGS metagenomic sequences that is analogous to the Bray-Curtis index for species, implemented by the General Utility for Testing Sequence Similarity (GUTSS) software application. This method was applied to intestinal microbiomes of healthy young children to measure developmental changes toward an adult microbiome during the first 3 years of life. We also calculate similarity of donor and recipient microbiomes to measure establishment, or engraftment, of donor microbiota in fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) studies focused on mild to moderate Crohn's disease. We show how a relative index of similarity to donor can be calculated as a measure of change in a patient's microbiome toward that of the donor in response to FMT.

conclusionBecause clinical efficacy of the transplant procedure cannot be fully evaluated without analysis methods to quantify actual FMT engraftment, we developed a method for detecting change in the gut microbiome that is independent of species identification and database bias, sensitive to changes in relative abundance of the microbial constituents, and can be formulated as an index for correlating engraftment success with clinical measures of disease. More generally, this method may be applied to clinical evaluation of human microbiomes and provide potential diagnostic determination of individuals who may be candidates for specific therapies directed at alteration of the microbiome.

Indexed as

Crohn DiseaseFecal Microbiota TransplantationLiving DonorsMetagenomeMetagenomicsSequence AlignmentAdolescentAdultChildFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID27391011
PMCPMC4938407
OpenAlexW2467962424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.